Erth Paradine
Server Admln & Bug Reporter
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2016
- Messages
- 239
- Reaction score
- 58
True, however such systems tend to be quite bulky. The fragility of insulation layers and radiators could also add a challenging twist too.
- Status
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2013
- Messages
- 530
- Reaction score
- 348
I quite like the proposed overhaul. I would prefer a system where both availability of power and heat production are tracked simultaneously, but in the absence of that I'd prefer heat over power. With this I'm assuming our reactor core, if its large enough in the first place, simply produces as much as we need at all times and were just managing the heat?
I do think its a nice solution to the issues with power currently, especially in very small craft where setting up the reactor lines with the aesthetic you desire is often a pain, and I'd been hoping for a heat mechanic too. Having a power reactor core, conduits and coolant chambers sound much more shippy than the reactor lines we have now. I do look forward to shields being converted to a system like this too. Dunno about thrust...
Anyway, I would like to see a test of this sort of system in game, so we can see how its actually put together and then work out how to improve it.
I do think its a nice solution to the issues with power currently, especially in very small craft where setting up the reactor lines with the aesthetic you desire is often a pain, and I'd been hoping for a heat mechanic too. Having a power reactor core, conduits and coolant chambers sound much more shippy than the reactor lines we have now. I do look forward to shields being converted to a system like this too. Dunno about thrust...
Anyway, I would like to see a test of this sort of system in game, so we can see how its actually put together and then work out how to improve it.
Raisinbat
Raging Troll
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2014
- Messages
- 459
- Reaction score
- 269
It's the best solution given the information we have. Its a pattern not a finished ship, and that's the pattern that produces the best results, because it's more mass efficient and therefor stronger.
As opposed to a ship with the same mass invested in 500 small turrets with super fast tracking that will obliterate a small ship in one hit...
You need advantages to large weapons before you start adding disadvantages; we can just split them into many small.
You attach them to your ship, and they power it... What complexity are you talking about???
DukeofRealms this is why pvp players get mad on the forums.
All of this is based on the notion that PVP ships cannot have interiors, which is nonsense:
VanuBAS-Chronos-12K
NFD Cherokee, CA-122B Heavy Cruiser
DSY Inc. Type-D Scimitar
And i'm sure there are plenty more out there. Why are the mods totally fine with this misinformation being propagated, but crack down on worthwhile discussion just because it's a little harsh? If you're eliminating the people who make good posts instead of the people who spread nonsense and clog up discussion with realism and sci fi arguments while having no experience with the actual game part, is that really beneficial for the forums?
Basically this is RP players complaining that they aren't able to build effective ships, not that it's impossible. There's so much vitriol between PVP and RP communities because the RP community wants to destroy the PVP game. That's the bottom line of it, even if they don't think that's what they're doing, they want system design gone from the game, because they don't want any restrictions at all on their RP ships, even if it means removing system design completely from the game.
If this heat mechanic gets implemented for all the systems like you sugested then it is dictating mass distribution for ships eliminating the single most important component to competitive ship design.
Look at it this way.
If i start up sim city, but instead of building a city i put on a gruff sergeant voice, select the bulldoze tool and start "shooting" the trees while pretending they're enemy soldiers, i'm not really playing the game, i'm just being a tard. There's nothing wrong with being a tard (so long as noone catches you doing it) but should the developers of sim city be catering to that? Should trees start shooting back, or cities be limited in how many buildings you're allowed to have in a certain space to facilitate the room for enemy trees?
The problem with the starmade community is that people who want a space game where you build and fly around in a ship, shoot people, mine or conquer the universe don't really have any point to stay since the game isn't ready for that; only the cosmetic tools are in the game, so the people staying are focused on cosmetics instead of gameplay. This has inflated the community with aesthetics and rp people with no regards for starmade being a game, who would rather see it turned into a glorified 3D modelling tool. Listening to the majority of players, when the community is this skewed away from being a game, is a huge mistake:
Games are defined by limitation; interacting with and overcoming it. Being able to go wherever you want and do whatever you want with no limitation makes for a terrible game.
It also means your game lacks purpose; You can't beat that guy because you aren't strong enough, you can't get up there until you have the double jump, you can't buy the sword until you have the money etc etc if you're free to access these things immediately.
I want purpose to my ships; i want how they're built to make them good at something and bad at something else. I want my ships limited in how far they can go, what resources they can mine, and how much they can carry because those are challenges to be overcome, not a limitation on your space Winnebago, and it's what creates purpose in the game. RP players design their ships to look a certain way with total disregard for mechanics, then expects the game to accomodate their design, while functional players build their ships with mechanics in mind; these two philosophies are NOT compatible; it either matters or it doesn't. There's no middle ground available, no diplomatic solution. If you cater to the RP community starmade will cease to be a game, please don't.
This is a really important point. Weapon system building is really good, it just needs some ballance changes.
Fine in the sense that RP players get what they want as usual and PVP dies. Good job.
This is true when it goes PVP -> RP, but RP -> PVP cannot work, because it refuses to adapt to the game's mechanics.
Going back to the rp nonsense: They're movies. They're not interactive, and they don't have ships that exploit their non-existant mechanics because they can just choose not to build them, just like you're free not to build them.
In typical RP fashion the ship is chosen based on aesthetics alone, and the game must be forced to accomodate it, all else be damned.
Here's the thing:
Imagine, if you will, the average modern destroyer. Naval ships are generally the best RL counterpart we have to their spacefaring equivalents we see so often in Science Fiction.
A modern destroyer is not built with rooms for "interior decorations". Engine rooms, combat information centres, crew quarters, food storage, damage control - all these rooms have very real purposes.
A Starmade ship doesn't need these things. Players do not starve or dehydrate - you do not need canteens and stores of perishables. Players need not sleep nor defecate - you do not need crew quarters or sanitary facilities. Players can instantly heal themselves with a single 1x1 block - you do not need medical bays. Players do not need to interact with various computers and consoles in order to control the ship - there is no need for a bridge, or a command centre, or anything.
A Starmade ship as of current can be composed of nothing but ordnance, power and engines, and still function in absence of all these otherwise critical components.
This is why in real life, tanks and planes and ships and subs all have so much "interior decoration" - because this interior decoration isn't interior decoration. These "decorations" are the practical application of active systems. Whether it be food, ammunition, communications, consumables, or otherwise, these "decorations" are critical to the operation of a vessel.
The new system punishes people who throw every other thing out the window in favour of bumping up their stats as high as possible. I would expect that to be intentional - for in general a well-crafted, attractive looking vessel is generally preferable to a minmaxed cardboard box full of systems. It's understandable; what video game wants ugly, featureless hulks to represent their gameplay?
It encourages players to build, or at least use, more attractive ships. I don't see what's wrong with that.
Lecic
Convicted Lancake Abuser
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 5,107
- Reaction score
- 1,228
Wrong. Adding rooms beyond whatever is absolutely necessary for your crew would be completely pointless and would, in fact, hurt the ship, because you COULD put the new interior filler block or just some rocks or something in there instead, and those would absorb some damage.
You've just pointed out one the major flaws in the heat boundary box system. Thanks.
Or.... OR.... crew could do it, while also being less restrictive on players?
If the game was to have fuel, I would suggest having Power Auxiliaries run off of it. This would primarily only effect player piloted ships anyway, since even if AI could use aux and didn't have terrible piloting ability, commanders would probably still only put AI control over ships up to the power softcap just because of power and resource effectiveness.
How do heatboxes make people build more attractive ships? What in this suggestion stops me from just building an ugly, featureless brick?
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2013
- Messages
- 34
- Reaction score
- 34
Not YET. There has been an update in the works for a while that will add crew quarters and actually crew NPCs. These NPCs are intended to add benefits to ship performance, but require certain things, like sleep and recreation, in order to continue efficiently. So while it is currently true that you only need the player to pilot an entire ship at peak efficiency, that won't be the case forever.
[doublepost=1486966753,1486965113][/doublepost]Not trying to throw hate towards the PvP players here, but you guys have gotten plenty of love from the dev team. They have bent over backwards trying to get all the weapons, armor, shields, and other systems perfectly balanced.
Now, this system is something that nearly every single RP player has been asking about, since power generation was introduced. It will change the game, but we should expect that, this game isn't even in beta yet.
Also, let's not forget that RP players want to fight with their ships too, they just want to have their elegant ships and interiors to be practical while they do it.
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2013
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 22
You are absolutely correct in this one point, the game isn't finished. The rest of your argument about RPers vs PvPers is completely meaningless as you are basing you opinion on an unfinished portion of a game and making assumptions on what the creators are intending to do with it. I think the fact that this proposal was made is an indication of the direction the game is going.
I can understand why all the PvPers see this thread as such a threat, this would be quite a huge change and would invalidate months of fine tuning. Fortunately I have a solution for you all that will save you from not only this potential change but any other adjustments, stop updating. Pick a version and call that "competitive Starmade"
I'm new to this discussion but:
I am totally excited for the idea. I hate the current issue of "stuff it to the gills with systems and any style is wasted space". If weapons systems follow a similar route, then I will be totally excited. My idea would by weapons that are as powerful as you set them, but overheat or max out by size, and that size is smaller than the massive chunks of blocks.
I would also like to see the "weapon effect modules" removed and changed into just the computer linked to save systems space. It would be very cool to focus on the design of ships with this 'mech warrior' heat and equip system.
Creativity will always be possible because of creative mode and people with patience, but the core game needs a much more fluid and creative solution to flight than everyone settling on tubes/cubes with cameras. This sounds like small shuttles will be able to have reasonable weapons for their size and power cores, while scaled up ships will also be bound more to the idea of "how can I optimize my ship for battle while also looking awesome".
I am totally excited for the idea. I hate the current issue of "stuff it to the gills with systems and any style is wasted space". If weapons systems follow a similar route, then I will be totally excited. My idea would by weapons that are as powerful as you set them, but overheat or max out by size, and that size is smaller than the massive chunks of blocks.
I would also like to see the "weapon effect modules" removed and changed into just the computer linked to save systems space. It would be very cool to focus on the design of ships with this 'mech warrior' heat and equip system.
Creativity will always be possible because of creative mode and people with patience, but the core game needs a much more fluid and creative solution to flight than everyone settling on tubes/cubes with cameras. This sounds like small shuttles will be able to have reasonable weapons for their size and power cores, while scaled up ships will also be bound more to the idea of "how can I optimize my ship for battle while also looking awesome".
Raisinbat
Raging Troll
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2014
- Messages
- 459
- Reaction score
- 269
Nothing in my post says this
And yet here you are doing exactly what i'm accusing you of doing.
No. No you scumbag, this would DESTROY THE GAME FOR US, thats not "change" or "months of work" going away, that's ending the fucking game. And we're not complaining about changes to the powersystem, i'm sure as shit not, we're complaining because it BREAKS THE GAME.
With broken AI, modular ships and garbage performance? Yeah, great idea! Have the devs stop working on the game and add more retarded roleplaying garbage for your unquenchable interior decorating thirst.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2013
- Messages
- 34
- Reaction score
- 34
Lecic
Convicted Lancake Abuser
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 5,107
- Reaction score
- 1,228
Yes, the devs HAVE done a lot of work balancing the systems in this game, so that makes me think- why are they throwing it all away for a system that probably isn't even necessary?
As for that second part...
Crew can accomplish what you people want without putting massive limitations on how ships can and cannot be built.
Raisinbat
Raging Troll
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2014
- Messages
- 459
- Reaction score
- 269
I play the game to make effective combat ships
This idiot wants to standardize combat effectiveness across all ships so RP players aren't disadvantages for being terrible because they're incompetent gameplay communists who thinks all ships should be equal.
How am i going to make effective combat ships when that's literally impossible?
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2013
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 22
refer:
Breaks the game as you know it. And that's the core of my point, the game isn't finished. What was made 2 years ago would work now, why should progress stop if the devs aren't happy with the way it is.
nightrune
Wizard/Developer/Project Manager
- Joined
- May 11, 2015
- Messages
- 1,324
- Reaction score
- 577
Lecic
Convicted Lancake Abuser
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 5,107
- Reaction score
- 1,228
Sunk cost is only applicable when the system actually needs removed and replaced. I'm not really sure power needs to be scrapped and replaced with heat.
Aye, but it's a solid bet that those proper crew NPCs won't be in game for quite a while to come. Centralised reactor cores as opposed to lines of power reactors do seem to be more interesting, though it's really subjective.
It's not perfect, but it does at least reduce the appeal of ugly, featureless bricks. Sort of a competitive demand deal. In any case, I'm kind of on the fence with the heat field thing; I'm more of a supporter of the "centralised power" idea.
Ladies and gentlemen,
May I present to you the epitome of Starmade.
Lecic
Convicted Lancake Abuser
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 5,107
- Reaction score
- 1,228
How? Explain. You have yet to explain at all how it does this.
Really tired of people who just build RP ships talking about the PvP scene like they know anything about it beyond a few lines of chat they read in 2014 about cubes being OP.Ladies and gentlemen,
May I present to you the epitome of Starmade.
Let me make this absolutely clear, under no uncertain terms, to anyone reading this-
CUBES ARE NOT OVERPOWERED AND ARE ACTUALLY A TERRIBLE CHOICE OF SHIP SHAPE IN THE MODERN META.
nightrune
Wizard/Developer/Project Manager
- Joined
- May 11, 2015
- Messages
- 1,324
- Reaction score
- 577
I'm still waiting to see what comes of this thread, but the more I lay out numbers, the better heat seems to be, at least conceptually, easier to balance and tie into other gameplay dynamics. Which is something I find very intriguing. Including heat being the way you find ships and weak spots in ships. My particular view on ship building is that everything should have a weakpoint. Mostly because people won't ever select a weak point. It becomes the choice in your design.
I happen to fall into a mix PVP and RP realm. Its the most fun for me because I value immersion the most, but not at the cost of fun. Everyone's idea of fun is a bit different. There quite a few in here that value combat prowess and design over everything, but the problem might actually be those players are too good at what you do. Some of the meta weapons I've seen are incredible, but I don't think it makes for a good game since there is no clear path forward for someone new. In fact the more approachable something is the more likely you are to have battles. I like the idea of the new mechanism since it avoids odd numbers and power limits, which we could do in a power system but I think heat works better at large. Allowing the environment to affect system performance as well. Too close to a sun then you overheat faster without the damage. Oh but I'm a small ship and your scanners can't seem me since I generate less heat then the sun, that's awesome as well. Those aren't talked about in the original op but that's the kind of feed back they are asking for.
In most building games RP takes a back seat to PVP, it doesn't have to be that way, and I fail to see why in starmade it has to be that way. Combat just happens to be the main gameplay element right now. I doubt that'll last.
Raisinbat
Raging Troll
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2014
- Messages
- 459
- Reaction score
- 269
See:
WHERE ARE THESE CUBES??? I've NEVER seen one, except for my balistic test dummy, and noone is flying that. If you dont do pvp why talk about it. You don't know what you're talking about and are just ruining the game for others because you're an idiot.
Then read the thread ffs. RP design = non-functional arbitrary ship design, while PVP = focused mechanical design. Making RP design viable = removing mechanical design from the equation = no more game for PVP.
Last edited:
nightrune
Wizard/Developer/Project Manager
- Joined
- May 11, 2015
- Messages
- 1,324
- Reaction score
- 577
I fail to see how these must be mutually exclusion in something virtually, creatively designed by humans. I doubt this is dictated by the laws of computing and imagination.
- Status