Power System Overhaul Proposal

    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Joined
    Nov 9, 2014
    Messages
    40
    Reaction score
    395
    • Competition Winner - Small Fleets
    • Community Content - Silver 1
    • Legacy Citizen 9
    Overall, I like this proposed system, or at least the idea of power being based less on shear size and more on smart design. I also like the idea that the complexity of the reactor increases as the power requirements increase. Simple starter ships stay simple and capital ships take a lot of thought and design, showing skill as a builder. However, I do have a few suggestions.

    Graphic
    Build mode- Have an option to "show heat boundary" to give a visual of how far away parts need to be. It could faintly fill in the blocks in the same way as cargo space, or it could outline the boundary with lines like the place blocks tool in adv build mode. It would also change color to red or hazard stripe if a system overlaps into another boundary.

    We also need some kind of value or percent in build mode to show if the power reactor will be enough for all of the systems on the ship (or at least the vital systems like thrust, shield, some weapons) or if it will overheat.

    Flight mode- I know heat level will probably be displayed, but also we need a "power usage" meter so we know when we're over-exerting the ship's power capability. It could also be a percent, but it could go above 100% if using power beyond the reactor's limit and causing overheating. The meter could switch colors or flash when over 100% to indicate overheating.

    Mechanics
    I like the idea of having the power system have a core with chambers to improve performance. For coolant, Ice crystal could be used, since it already spawns naturally, or it could be crafted into a transparent glowing crystal-liquid. Also, heat shields could be used to lessen the heat boundaries created by reactors and chambers. The same heat shielding could be used on the outside of ships to protect from sun damage.

    Shields and thrust- I'm afraid of the systems for shields and thrust becoming too complicated and tedious if they also use their own reactor core and chambers. They should use a much more simplified system that ties into the main power system. Building the power system would be fun and very important, but if we had to build the same system at least three times per ship for crucial systems, it would get old fast, not to mention if weapons used a similar system. They also shouldn't have to be connected to the power system through pipes or conduits, only chambers and reactors should.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Vvolodymyr
    Joined
    Jan 2, 2016
    Messages
    50
    Reaction score
    46
    Wow, just wow. This is the damned biggest explosion of a thread I have seen in ages. But lets get to the point here.

    Now, the one thing I am most concerned about is

    , this point hasn't really been tacked directly, but it really, really, should be.

    Well, when one says only 5% is necessary to operate the ship, it doesn't strictly mean you can only place 5%, as such this implies that the current system filling for big ships would be factors of magnitude more effective compared to now, considering that most ships have at the very least 30-50% systems, even with interior. Power is the smallest percentage of all so "it'll only apply for power" won't work.

    The only thing I can think of right now that will reverse this potentially game-breaking change would be to implement exponentially savage requirements, power most notably, for said systems to run. This will make building bigger more and more difficult to the point of which a bigger ship is just more interior than the previous.
    However, this does not apply to weapons. Therefore simply moving up a little bit up the slippery slope would gain quite a proportionately larger linear advantage in firepower due to it's current behaviour, making larger ships more favourable than... oh dear.
    Weapons would need a rework with a factor larger than 1 too, which would roughly balance this out, but the numbers will determine the more practical ship size so this has to be considered extremely carefully for I fear that it'll slap a large portion of SM's community in the face.

    Constructive criticism welcome.
    I absolutely agree that scalability has to be managed Very carefully, with weapons as well. I do feel that Harsh "exponentially savage" requirements will be necessary - but there should still be some incentive for large ships. But looking at the OP suggestion - I think they will increase the heat box to the point that at some large ship size there will be less system-usable volume available. I guess they'll have to take care to scale it just right. I am thinking that there will be possibility to build still reasonably efficient giant ships that are not OP, BUT they will just become less interesting in shape choices - which seems fair :)
     

    Az14el

    Definitely not a skywanderers dev
    Joined
    Apr 25, 2015
    Messages
    848
    Reaction score
    325
    • Legacy Citizen 2
    • Purchased!
    • Community Content - Bronze 1
    Was going to say something about refits and how much they suck, but hey this might motivate me to actually build something new again.
    All my larger stuff was completely terrible for reasons outlined in OP anyway, chasing true efficiency at 100k+ mass is a lovecraftian descent into fucking madness.

    I think fundamental changes to how power circulation works had to happen by some point, reducing the amount of weapons & reactors required to reach equivalent to previous values has also been a long time coming, and the armor scaling by mass is an intelligent way of keeping the new weapons/power in check. While SM has an incredible depth of engineering, and plenty of knowledge to be mastered, strategy & mechanical skill have taken a back-seet to simply cranking out every lick of e/s, actual dps & thrust your design can allow, at the cost of creative butchery.
     
    Joined
    Dec 7, 2016
    Messages
    3
    Reaction score
    0
    This is a proposal; we're looking for feedback on this system so that we can develop the best power system with assistance from the community. We realise that we may have overlooked some aspects of gameplay, this is why we're sharing our idea. Let's work together to create something great. Posts that aren't contributing to the discussion here will be removed, let's keep it clean. - DukeofRealms

    Introduction

    The power system was a point of contention for as long as StarMade existed, and there was never a real consensus on a specific solution. We went through every possible way to rebalance the current system, but each of them would create a problem elsewhere. We realized that we would have to redo a big portion of that later and waste even more time on things we can resolve right now.

    Instead of trying to keep a broken system alive, we decided to make a cut and redesign it from the ground up. This solution would be drastic and would require you to refit power in almost all of your ships. However, in the long run this would still be better as changes in the new system would require a lot less adaption from this point on. So instead of frustrating players with small changes that likely wouldn’t fix the problems to begin with and would require players to refit their ships every time, we decided that it’s better to do one big change to solve the core problems once and for all. It’s important that we get this right from the start which is why we’re asking you for more feedback.

    Since a news post is probably not the best place to discuss it, we moved it to here. We will be making more of these threads to keep you in touch.

    Please keep in mind that everything is subject to change if there is a valid reason to do so. We kindly ask that you keep the discussions civil. These threads will be heavily moderated to ensure the most productive discourse possible.

    The way we went about designing this new system is a relatively straightforward procedure:
    1. Identify the problems
    2. Find out what causes the problems
    3. Try to eliminate those causes with new mechanics

    Problems with the current power system

    According to our own experience and player experiences shared on the forums, we have identified the following problems.
    1. Forced design choices
    2. Lack of complexity
    3. Too many blocks involved (number, not types)
    4. Focused on regen
    Some of these overlap a bit though.

    Forced design choices

    StarMade has a great build system with endless options when it comes to decorating your structures or creating complex interiors, yet making a ship functional with all our systems can take a while and is usually a less creative process.

    It’s not only the power system that suffers from it, but every other functional system that follows its design principles. Currently, most ships have a non functional ‘skin’ and everything else is filled to the brim with systems.

    Filling your entire ship with systems is the most optimal way to make a ship. Making any interior or extra decoration creates weaknesses on your ship. It also favours one ship shape over another, in order to fill it with as many systems as possible; Doom cubes.

    More systems and power means a better ship, and there is no incentive or mechanic that would ever make a pretty ship with interior as good as one filled with systems.
    Lack of complexity

    Our current power system has only 3 different block types which would be fine if it mattered more in how you placed them. That’s not always the case and usually there’s little to do besides changing the amount of a certain block when necessary.

    This gets very tedious at larger scales. Fitting a bigger ship with power blocks is just a matter of finding the space for it. There doesn’t have to be any thought about placement and possible consequences. Additionally there is no way to customize your ship’s power systems.

    The current system makes power and systems purely a game of ratios, which doesn’t offer much complexity and increases the total number of blocks.
    Too many blocks involved

    As the system forces you to balance the amount of blocks placed on your ship between 3 power block types, you constantly end up removing one type to replace it with another unless you calculate the amount of blocks needed for each type. Even then you have to roughly know how many blocks your ship can fit.

    This is fine for ships where only a few hundred blocks are involved. You usually remember where you placed them and changing ratios isn’t a long process. Each system block matters a lot more in this case.

    It’s not fine when your ship size becomes larger. Most ships have more than 100,000 blocks and it’s impossible to know where you placed all your blocks down. Filling your ship with the correct amount of blocks per type is a tedious and long process. Not to mention that changing it afterwards is even more frustrating where you have to dig for specific block types and you end up with a complete system mess.

    Although additional build tools could alleviate some of these issues, it would never be completely resolved and any new system we add here would inherit this fundamental problem.

    The current system makes power and systems purely a game of ratios, which doesn’t offer much complexity and only gets worse with a higher total block count. Also, the volume to surface area does not scale favorably for balance, and there is no incentive not to fill up a ship with systems. The larger your ship, the more volume you usually have compared to your surface area.
    Focused on regen

    Currently you will always care more about power regen than capacity, mostly because it’s scaled that way. In almost every case, you want to equalize your power regen with your total consumption during combat. Your capacity would be increased to have a small reserve that equals this consumption so that you can use all your systems at once and regen the power within a few seconds.

    This results in a boring way of building ships since there’s little difference in power systems for any ship you create, it’s a simple equation and can result in a lot of frustration to achieve that goal.

    Not to mention that it’s hard to make the AI use this system when their capacity is always too low to work with.​


    Solution

    To get rid of the aforementioned problems, we need to turn the entire power system upside down. This will break most if not all current ships but to us, it’s a necessary step to continue on game mechanics without always having to find workarounds.

    As redoing the systems now will be easier, yet more complex, we hope you will find it a refreshing and fun building process. Additional build tools will speed up that process where you refurbish any of your ships.

    A short summation of what we’ll do:
    • Systems (weapons, thrust, power, etc) will take a considerably smaller amount of space on your ship. This could be ranging from 5% (large ships) to 50% (small ships) of your total block count. The way we will achieve this is described in the section below.
    • Due to systems being a lot smaller, there will be a lot more empty space the larger a ship gets. The player is free to leave it empty, or put in decoration and interior at a very low cost to mass.
    • We will also offer a block to serve as an “inner hull”, which will be a low mass, low HP block. You could use it to fill empty areas in your ship, or replace it with real interiors without making the ship weaker by doing that.
    • Normal hull (armor) will add enough mass so it would not be viable to fill your ships with it.
    • Making sure that most systems are usually clustered together and not spread out all over the ship in small amounts. This makes defending specific areas of your ship more important and could be incentive to add more inner armor to those locations.
    • As the amount of blocks involved is a lot less than before, we can add extra mechanics to the placement of system blocks. That will introduce complexity on a small scale since every block you place is equally important.
    • Provide context based information to the player and add “logical” mechanics to a ship to make it easier for players to get started. Also keeping the new system easy to use for small ships.
    • Change armor so that it scales accordingly for weaker and larger ships, without adding extra thickness to your ship.
    • Weapons will also be adjusted although that’s for another thread.

    Reactor design

    The new power system is of a modular design. Depending on your reactor size, you’ll have 1 or more components that influence the final result and define your ship’s capability:​

    • Reactor core:
    • Reactor chamber types:
      • Reactor rod system that requires built-in coolant
      • Heat shielding
      • Coolant Tanks
      • ...
    • Conduits to connect the chambers

    The reactor core (a relatively small cluster of blocks) defines it output. The bigger your reactor is, the more complex it will get. This means you will have to add and connect additional chambers to your reactor at certain points to keep it from producing additional heat. When considering new players, this ensures that building power for a very small ship is still easy. It’s complexity grows with ship size, so the learning curve for players will not get too steep.

    Heat

    We remove “power regen” and “power capacity” as we know them right now and replace it with only one value you would see on your screen: Heat, 0% to 100%

    Anything that previously used power, will now generate heat instead. Depending on your reactor size and how you build it, the heat you accumulate will be manageable...or it won’t be.

    If your reactor is too small for the systems you want to use, they generate more heat than usual:
    • Reactor has X output depending on reactor core (optimally built reactor)
    • Needs Y power depending on systems (weapons, thrust, etc)
      • Y - X = deviation
    • Heat generated is deviation + defaultMinOfSystem
    If your reactor is too big, you would not generate extra heat, but you would be wasting power and space due to the new “heat influence area” or “hear boundary” system we will talk about below.

    Heat generation will be available to the player in percent by value. We will also break down for the player, what they can do to improve their reactor.
    Cooldown

    Heat cooldown will be constant and independent of how big your reactor is. What changes is the speed in which a ship accumulates heat depending on how optimal their reactor is built. Accumulating too much heat will affect your systems, and if you keep pushing to the limit, systems would even shut down completely. We could introduce all sorts of ways to have Heat influence your ship, or even have Stars influence your Heat if that would be a nice addition.

    With this system, detach the system from large numbers since your Heat levels will always be between 0% and 100% and your heat dissipation will be a % per second.

    You are not limited to only one reactor core on your ship though, you can put down more of them but the heat generated by your systems would be increased per additional reactor. Putting additional reactors down will ensure that you have backups running if one or more reactors get damaged or destroyed during battle so it’s a nice balance between efficiency and sustainability that you can define.
    Heat Influence Area

    Each reactor core has their own “Heat” influence area or boundary box, which takes the shape of your ship’s dimension box and its size is determined by the reactor core block amount. If this Heat boundary box overlaps with any other system, or another reactor core, extra heat generation penalties are added. This forces you to think twice where to place your reactors and it limits the amount of blocks you can use in your reactors. Your weapons/thrusters/etc cannot be within those heat boxes or you will suffer a large efficiency loss.

    This does create a lot of empty space between your systems, space that can be filled up with something that isn’t systems like interior.

    The designer is of course free to chose if they want to have an interior. We will also offer a“Inner Hull” block which will be cheap, have low mass and no armor, with a few block hp to not directly expose your inner systems on a hull breach.

    Their collective mass would be negligible compared to what your systems and armor add to the ship and they would also not add enough protection to where it’s better to fill up a ship instead of having an interior.

    We will also have some extra build tools to help you out with filling/removing that particular block type.
    Other systems

    Shields could be their own “reactor” with its own chambers etc and we could do something similar to thrusters.

    They could also just be a few chambers that use a Power reactor.

    We’re not sure about that yet though, it doesn’t matter too much as long as those system’s block count is kept small. Both are limited by their Heat generation so we don’t need to do anything besides buffing their values per block and adjusting the heat generation to make them work for now.​

    Reactor mechanics
    The bigger your reactor gets, the more requirements it will get to keep heat generation to a minimum. This means that you could build a small fighter without having to worry about reactor placement at all. Also, building the iconic core + power + thrust stick will still be possible.

    When you build medium sized ships, not only will the heat influence area already affect the placement of your systems a little, but you will also get more heat generation in general. To keep this heat generation low, you can add an additional chamber to your reactor. And the more core blocks the reactor gets, the more chambers can be added to keep heat generation low.

    The Core and Chambers each have their own local heat area which is only relevant to the reactor design. The size of those areas will be its groups dimensions multiplied by a factor depending on balance. If this box overlaps with other local boxes, you get a rather big efficiency loss. This means each chamber will have to be independent.

    Core

    As this is the base component, its size defines the base statistics/output of your ship. Currently there’s only one block type for it right now so you just end up placing them together as a small group.

    A bigger reactor core group can be connected to other chambers in order to combat growing heat generation, add additional output or achieve a different effect. We haven’t fully decided on the specific types of chambers yet.
    Chamber

    A chamber is essentially an upgrade to your reactor. Each chamber will only be effective at a certain minimum size of reactor. It could combat heat generation, amplify output, redirect that output to another system (shields?) or just be a necessary component to be there or else a Reactor core wouldn’t do anything.
    To keep your reactor optimal, you’ll require more chambers the bigger your reactor core goes. The specifics aren’t fully set in stone of course.

    The base mechanics stay the same however, each chamber type has its own build restrictions and requirements in order to be valid.
    Example: A reactor chamber could be reactor rods, to maximize output for a mid-sized reactor core. It would generate heat, if water is touching them that heat would be less. They have to be in a single group or there would be penalties.

    The total heat versus the total amount of rod blocks determines its efficiency, stability, heat radius, throughput and more… It doesn’t matter too much what we do with this since we can easily change it between updates without messing people up.

    A chamber will orientate on the size of the reactor core. That’s easy to adjust if needed.

    Chamber shape and placement could also be an important factor to keep in mind. A “Thruster” chamber (if we’re going to use that) could be great for rotation when placed near your Center of Mass. And great for a particular thrust direction when placed the furthest away from your Center of Mass on that axis.
    Conduit

    The block you use to connect chambers with other chambers, or connecting them back to the reactor core is done by using Conduits. A single conduit block has a fixed throughput but the longer a line is, the more throughput loss you get.

    You would prefer to have these conduits as short as possible.​

    Kupu made some info graphics of this current system and how it might look like if implemented:
    • Example of a reactor


    • Below is an example of how it could look like in-game for a ship. Any not used space would either be inner hull or interior. You could also make interior within the heat boundary boxes since those only affect systems.



    • Keep in mind that the heat boundary box doesn’t go out of the ship dimension box. Putting your reactors on the edge of your ship will make the heat boundary box move till it’s not overlapping with the edges. It’s basically forcing the heat boundary box to be more inside of the ship than the reactor itself.
    All Is Very complex, I agree with the philosophy behind it but not sure this is a good answer. BUT.... What about stations? I see nothing here in that regard. I also understand this is a beta project..... but geez a little stability is needed in this game. It's like the rug gets pulled out from under you every few weeks or.... so, and really frustrates a lot of people that don't come back to play...
    I really like the game..... Some work on "play-ability" needs to be addressed though. Better networking connections comes to mind...
     
    Joined
    Aug 11, 2013
    Messages
    242
    Reaction score
    117
    • Purchased!
    • Community Content - Bronze 2
    • Legacy Citizen 2
    I'm going to love this, eventually. However, I'm going to hate it when it is first implemented - not because it's a bad mechanic. I'll hate it because retrofitting ships is my absolute bane.
     

    Sachys

    Hermit.
    Joined
    Nov 30, 2015
    Messages
    648
    Reaction score
    318
    On the note of refits - surely this would be a good time to implement Shipyard filtering - not the standard, advanced build mode filtering, but automated on a grand scale from the shipyard computer.

    For example, I may select to swap out all orange hull (and sub-shapes thereof), for advanced grey armour.
    Or... simply remove all power reactors in the entire build, (obviously adv. build mode would still take care of less sweeping filtering needs).

    I'd imagine it working like shipyard repair does now - save for the fact its purely affecting the design.

    At the same time, it would be useful to have a "save as" feature for shipyard designs to help prevent accidental design damage - and I mean outside of saving a BP.

    (less on topic, but relevant to my suggestion here for refits in relation to this suggested change).

    Edit: Have now added this in the suggestions - Improved Shipyards - Filtering
     
    Last edited:
    Joined
    Jun 29, 2013
    Messages
    95
    Reaction score
    3
    Really? docked ship's turrets still shoot at the inside of a carrier when there is an enemy outside, and the sectors are still not fixed so that ships don't jump around, and the power system is what you are worried about?
     

    Lecic

    Convicted Lancake Abuser
    Joined
    Apr 14, 2013
    Messages
    5,115
    Reaction score
    1,229
    • Thinking Positive Gold
    • Purchased!
    • Legacy Citizen 11
    The wedge shaped part is actually the problem. A long with the power and cap balancing that adds nothing to the game. This change has a chance to give players more choice. If you want to build a specific shape you then need to choose how you build your reactor to it. If you are building a pvp build you could start with the reactor, but actually you can choose a shape and fit reactor and weapons to it. The idea being you are no longer required to build a wedge shaped ship. That seems boring to me.
    But you're just trading the wedge for the chandelier with this system...
     

    nightrune

    Wizard/Developer/Project Manager
    Joined
    May 11, 2015
    Messages
    1,324
    Reaction score
    577
    • Schine
    • Top Forum Contributor
    • Thinking Positive
    But you're just trading the wedge for the chandelier with this system...
    As its explicitly stated sure, but have some imagination. Are there other ways we could have them work? Maybe some chambers need to be warmer to work better?
     
    Joined
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages
    4
    Reaction score
    0
    Well the current power mechanics certainly need an overhaul and this seems like the best solution.
     

    Endal

    Ex Torpedo Researcher
    Joined
    Dec 3, 2013
    Messages
    103
    Reaction score
    61
    • Legacy Citizen
    But you're just trading the wedge for the chandelier with this system...
    I have been hearing the chandelier style quite a lot, and I agree it is a valid point because of the concept of this mechanic which includes AOE debuff. However, what if the conduits are really bad at connecting the reactors? Then chandeliers are at an inherent disadvantage because it loses both effectiveness and efficiency. This would mean that your power needs to be centralised or it won't be worth a damn, and would be even worse at larger scales that would be powerful enough to circumvent this issue.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Merlin Atwares

    Lecic

    Convicted Lancake Abuser
    Joined
    Apr 14, 2013
    Messages
    5,115
    Reaction score
    1,229
    • Thinking Positive Gold
    • Purchased!
    • Legacy Citizen 11
    I have been hearing the chandelier style quite a lot, and I agree it is a valid point because of the concept of this mechanic which includes AOE debuff. However, what if the conduits are really bad at connecting the reactors? Then chandeliers are at an inherent disadvantage because it loses both effectiveness and efficiency. This would mean that your power needs to be centralised or it won't be worth a damn.
    What? The entire reactor is out on the chandelier, not just the chambers. There's no loss in efficiency from long conduits there.
     
    Joined
    Dec 25, 2015
    Messages
    145
    Reaction score
    21
    Some major restrictions with docked entities I can see with this. Self powered turrets has been a work around for power. Or active docked ships acting as stationary turrets. If this is to work for drones and fighters and be extremely efficient. Turrets would be what I'd want to optimize with this. And get around any building limitations
     

    Endal

    Ex Torpedo Researcher
    Joined
    Dec 3, 2013
    Messages
    103
    Reaction score
    61
    • Legacy Citizen
    What? The entire reactor is out on the chandelier, not just the chambers. There's no loss in efficiency from long conduits there.
    Ah, it seems that I have slightly misunderstood the OP. In that case, there has to be a loss factor for a reactor being too far from the system it is connected to, but that would be difficult to calculate...
     
    Joined
    Jul 13, 2013
    Messages
    35
    Reaction score
    5
    • Legacy Citizen 3
    I have read this, and the current comments to this point. I like what i have heard and a lot of good points. I however have a lot of concern despite my eagerness to get this system.

    Suggestions:
    • Have the Reactors provide and show only the max power made and heat generation. Remove the regen factor from the GUI and the power systems.
    • Allow for linking of the reactors to systems to provide them with power. For example the thrust having its own separate power source that it will use before falling back to the main power. as with each weapon system will have a power source to provide a boost to the main power while in combat.

    Problems with new system
    • With current vision of power system, unable to tell how much power you are making to have much power your systems are using, aka shields, thrust, and weapons.
    • I see troubles with a too large of a heat zone with larger reactor systems and how much the overlap will be.
    • Will the "heat zone" of the reactors be even throughout the ship? or will the height be offset but the ship of the ship. For example Will placing a reactor in the aft section top of a tall section fill just the defined height of the heat zone, or will it be the full height within the predefined heat zone?
    • Already mentioned but s complete rebuild of current ship, station designs
    • In what ways will this affect stations?
     
    Joined
    Jan 2, 2016
    Messages
    50
    Reaction score
    46
    Some major restrictions with docked entities I can see with this. Self powered turrets has been a work around for power. Or active docked ships acting as stationary turrets. If this is to work for drones and fighters and be extremely efficient. Turrets would be what I'd want to optimize with this. And get around any building limitations
    Shoot at dangling bits. Makes ships larger, vulnerable and less maneuverable. If you try to armor the dangly bits up till they are not visible - too much mass. If use less armor - still are encouraged to design a ship with some internal spaces. If don't like spaces - fill them up. Besides, the OP also proposed penalty for number of reactor groups.

    "chandelier" was interesting, on the spot, creative, clever thought. But considering all proposed OP ideas - it doesn't kill anything, doesn't really circumvent anything in the end. So far the difficulty will be in the details, numbers, falloff of efficiency, volume ratios etc - all the boring, tedious stuff that dev team will have to painstakingly tackle. It is a great opportunity to improve the systems of the game :)
    [doublepost=1486875732,1486875612][/doublepost]Sorry - meant to reply to Lecic
    Shoot at dangling bits.
     
    Joined
    Dec 25, 2015
    Messages
    145
    Reaction score
    21
    Shoot at dangling bits. Makes ships larger, vulnerable and less maneuverable. If you try to armor the dangly bits up till they are not visible - too much mass. If use less armor - still are encouraged to design a ship with some internal spaces. If don't like spaces - fill them up. Besides, the OP also proposed penalty for number of reactor groups.

    "chandelier" was interesting, on the spot, creative, clever thought. But considering all proposed OP ideas - it doesn't kill anything, doesn't really circumvent anything in the end. So far the difficulty will be in the details, numbers, falloff of efficiency, volume ratios etc - all the boring, tedious stuff that dev team will have to painstakingly tackle. It is a great opportunity to improve the systems of the game :)
    I was referring to turrets having these new reactors in the base/barrel
     
    Joined
    Jan 2, 2016
    Messages
    50
    Reaction score
    46
    I was referring to turrets having these new reactors in the base/barrel
    Yeah, sorry - I clicked on the wrong post - I meant to rely to Lecic.

    Regarding turrets - yeah that could be an exploit - but I am wondering how much power a number of those will provide as opposed to one main larger power reactor (granted with heatbox thing) - looks like a tweaking the balance thing - a math problem :)
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.