Search results

Excited for this :)

I missed this place

Beautiful. The song made the video :')

Same thing here. I thought about doing something very similar (not quite the same, but same general idea). Then I figured it would probably look like a pile of chicken dung mixed with blended frog. So I didn't bother.

The Agelast has been redone. Completely. And it is awesome. Stats: Mass: 4606.9 L/H/W: 101/41/43 Power: 9,675,125.6 (971,940 e/sec) Thrust: 8054.7 Turning: Similar to that of a fat lady after too much pizza. Shields: 119,539 Capacity, 11,176 per second recharge. DPS: What? Do you think we...

One of the first ships Verkit Industries ever made was the Agelast. Originally useful, pretty, and stronk. Now, we look back on the Agelast, and laugh at it. That ship was a joke. Some time ago, we upgraded the exterior of the Agelast. Now, the interior and systems have been redone. No longer...

I'm too lazy to watch right now. I did try something similar to this earlier this afternoon - no shops, no credits, only standard starting equipment, start on planet etc. It was bloody hard and I gave up. Anyway, what's the point in having credits if you're not using shops?

Move StarMade starter to a new location and press the "update" button once launched.

blurb357 Try installing in a new location. If you don't want to restart your universe/lose all of your blueprints, you can carry them over into the fresh build. It worked for me :) Good Luck.

Windows 8. Only started happening after I tried to download the new patch, and the download originally failed for it. Had to install it manually. Something about not having permission to modify files, but it did because previous downloads worked and I ran it in administrator mode. Not...

I'm experiencing the same problem as this. Launcher loads but upon pressing 'Start Game' the launcher closes as it should, but the settings window doesn't open. According to task manager nothing is opening either. I have Java 7 64bit and the latest version of StarMade. Sounds like their is no...

I'm probably just really slow ^-^ Or I do more than I realise in a set time. Probably the slow part. It's looking fantastic, by the way. One of those "I wish I was this good at this game" ships :)

On the whole two wedges for a block thing, a tetra + penta from one block would also make sense.

15 minutes? Are you kidding? It would take me hours to do that amount of detail!

I like it, although I do agree with Pi-Rex that it feels like something is missing. I do like it's simplicity - it can work just as well as lots of details. I also agree that the way it looks makes it look more heavily armoured, and it definitely doesn't look like a civilian ship. I think just a...

Well, I was sitting there, watching my minions work on the Invictus and I thought to myself: 'There is something wrong with this.' Then I realised; the front half was only connected to the back half by a flimsy little bridge. Also, the middle section was only connected to the back half, and that...

It looks better from a forward or behind angle as opposed to a profile. Plus, the ends of the bridge actually go right inside the main ship - they are the main point of entry to the bridge and out of it. It's also the path to get from the front of the ship to the back. I might go ahead and add...

More bridges than you can handle. Details will change, shape probably won't. I might add an under bridge though. (Not under the bridge underbridge, an undership underbridge. Unless I build more bridges, in which case I may make an underbridge bridge.)

Interesting how that can be so obvious yet so . . . Not-Obvious at the same time.

This is fantastic. Best wall of text I've read for quite some time ;)