Search results

A 5km carrier would still be possible, Note the "Mass" limit not size, If you build it with metal mesh then it will easily fit within the limit, Also as for fighter swarms, How much time does it take to manufacture those, Plus i dont think any server could survive thousands of AI drones, And in...

I Agree with that, And stock turrets that are functional for their task would do that perfectly because they could be examined and copied, Plus a player who is new to thegame would have a far easier time getting started as he could accumulate enough money then buy a basic ship a TG shipyard and...

Gigantism needs to STOP! Too many players and factions going around in server cracking titans! Nothing can fight them toe to toe but another titan and thus building more is further encouraged! Rant is over now dont worry, What im suggesting is a maximum stable mass limit on ships, If you build...

Yes but while the freedom to make your own ships is good, It means however that if you are inexperienced with weapon design then your ships will be shit in combat. It would be better in those cases for the player to just pull out a stock design.

Currently every system has its own colors which share little to no similarity with those of the adjacent systems, Nor are the transitions very smooth either. I propose that every galaxy when being generated randomly chooses a small set of colors and uses them for its systems, The separate...

Yes but i think it adds a lot more to the game if they add premade defaults.

I personally am terrible at designing weapon systems, Especially turrets, And there are probably more out there like me in this problem, I think the next patch to the game should come with a few turret blueprints for player use.

I just thought that your ship looked more like a conventional battlestar than an orion. Wasnt the orion much flatter in appearance and smaller too?

Ummm Rixan? Thats not what the orion looks like Osiris - Battlestar Wiki

Its all right, the idea was less about my own ideas then to start a think tank ;)

E Exactly! the benefit is it sticks to the primary shapes of the game, eliminating the need for multiple plates thus reducing lag.

If anyone wants to know what i mean by "cube" planets, then go into starmade take a ship core and place a armor block on each side, then use wedges and tetras to make it look kinda like a sphere, and the end result is that using wedges corners heptas and tetras you could make a planet that...

This^!!!! :D

No more planet :) might want to not nuke it then.

Perhaps. but then again arent we all just wanderers? Plus planets would be self healing, Any damage done to a planet with weapons or salvagers would slowly repair, Just wait for a world to regenerate :)

It could be good in multiplayer too, Factions would have to actually search space in order to find a planet worth mining or settling rather than being spammed with worlds that realistically should be rare as hell.

I kinda disagree the point of barren planets is to be boring, Exploration becomes far more exciting when you come across a RARE terran planet and pat yourself on the back for your luck, Rather than just saying "*sigh* Another random green planet, Too bad there are already like, A billion.)

How did it? can ya tell me?

Thats nice but isnt it kinda clunky? wouldnt it be better just to make a cube with rounded edges? using wedges corners heptas and tetras as well as diagonal gravity systems, you could make a planet that is just one single entity but works better than the dodecahedrons?

Round planets won't work in the game because spheres in a block game are simply impossible :) Relative gravity already exists. BTW what is dev opinion on removing those color orbs?