Search results

Neat idea, good potential. Allows for a small fallback base for a faction under siege, but doesn't allow complete homebase invulnerability when the Titan's docked there. That said, a homebase is still gonna be hard to crack even with only 35% damage resistance, because you're going to need...

Your GIF not only doesn't show multiple carriers landing and collecting drones, but it also nearly crashed my browser.

Oh, right, shields.....New idea: 50% of impact damage from cannons and missiles that is used up on the shields (I.E., hit shields with cannon round, cannon round doesn't go through) is transferred into motion on the target, sending it away from point of impact. PHYSICS: The purposes of our...

Why an energy-sharing ability at all? Like I said, it's useless unless you plan to be foolish and build drones or ships dependent on that extra energy. As far as I know, very few builders here are foolish enough to tie valuable military units to a power source that can be destroyed, giving the...

Exactly as Megacrafter said. This is a programming/spawning mechanism suggestion, not something that we'll be doing ourselves. It's just the simplest method of fixing potential clipping issues that I've seen. The game could define a larger box as well, and then spawn (Randomly) ships inside the...

To solve clipping, spawn a rectangular prism based on the max X, Y, and Z dimensions of each vessel, and spawn the next vessel so that it's box is OUTSIDE the first box. Done, problem solved, no complexities necessary.

Hopefully, yes. Hopefully soon, too.

OK, but then you need to define your own status for "Running low" and "Running high" in inventories....or you could just set 1 value as your midline and have default percentage-based increments for "Low" and "Really low" and so on.

That'd be an interesting algorithm to write, I'd think. You'd have to set a threshold for running low, one for running high....Many, many variables. All of which must be adjustable by the market owner.

Perhaps in order to implement bartering instead of paying, you could (As the shop owner) assign a value to everything you're willing to accept, and a value to everything you're willing to sell.

Interesting idea. Perhaps this can be added to shops as a functionality, instead of making a new block. Although....depending on how it all ends up UI-wise, it might simplify things to add another block with simplified function....Anyway.

I go with the "Hey look, it's there. Live with it. Oh, and slap some turretS on it." Singular turrets aren't good enough.

Well, people, that's it. Lecic and I agreed on something. World's ending.

Lots of rules restricting PvP for a server that says it's got a lot to do with everyone. Also, how can it be a completely roleplay server where you must always be in character and yet have a primary focus on PvP? What? Advertise it as an RP server with PvP elements, don't say PvP unless you're...

Markers are a good idea....but you can already rotate your view on the map.

Lecic, you've missed the point. This isn't a buff, it's a worthless pile of crap. You design a ship around it's power consumption. Weapons, thrust, even shields to some extent, jump drives, all require POWER. So we're going to build ships based around a 10x bonus, making that ship utterly...

Very nice idea. I think that this could be easily integrated with the use of scanners on stations and scanning vessels in ships....in that you don't get a warning that something's entered your space unless a vessel of yours (Or station) spots it on scanners. Scanning as per the Cloak, Scan, and...

I like the idea of a set flak system, to make it dangerous to fly around a vessel. Improves AMS considerably, but remember, a bursting shell (Even if it bursts on proximity) won't guarantee a hit on a missile, because of the semi-random distribution of cannon rounds from the burst. This would...

I'd say that you slave the transporter to a storage (Transporter as master, to follow the rails' pattern) in order to give it the ability to transfer and receive cargo. Allow larger amounts as well, based on number of transporter modules there are. So a large-scale cargo-elevator-sized...

I agree with the bit about permanent attachment, but I'd really like to see a form of semi-permanent attachment that allows for the combination and recombination of modules on a ship. In other words, you can, with a reactivation of the module, create a new entity based on a design inside of an...