Search results

This is very true and indeed more so (not less). At that stage StarMade is (IMHO) losing its way - the very basis and inspiration to play should be the need to RESEARCH it,BUILD it, BREAK it, FIX it ... Without that key motivator and central ethos, other RTS/FPS aspects of the game (that do...

Not so much stabalizers per se (they could still work in more interesting ways, and indeed are vastly improved from their first iteration) - but overall the giant 'cubes' of reactor/stabaliser/systems feel a bit crude. I am not sure that shields 2.0 fit well or are even particularly necessary -...

#Please, I Am So Broken and Lack-Luster, Fix Me. (best wishes, the latest Dev Build)

personal views on current dev build: sigh ... way off target still, in so many ways - and in some ways actually getting worse damage patterns are boring and repetitive - missiles are op and boring - cannons still crap - c/m just weird - bomb op (and daft if you think about it) - c/b damage...

hmm- sounds like a lot of useful tinkering you have done there - i am also still interested in making power generation a central design feature, ideally with a great deal of potential complexity and variance at the upper end - ideally Interesting Geometry Algorithms (and ideally...

yes maybe - but i was thinking simplified models, with simplified/low calculation 'random' damage, no separate turret entities, and maybe the whole performed/applied in a lower priority calculation space (compared to 'primary-combat-near-a-player')...i have know idea of the relative...

Nice idea - something different to current implementation is needed - it 'feels' awful at the moment.

all good ideas for a New actual Death-Star-esque Doom-Laser weapon type... but still (surely?) no need to lose the Less-than-doomy-but-still-high-power long-range laser (B/B) concept (for example, vs more efficient shorter-range 'Standard' beams, or high-power short-range 'laser-cutters').

...ah ha, thanks for pointing that out and insights guys. Maybe with much simplified and unified/similar damage models across different weapons (+ less variety in weapon types) (+ random 'aim-variance' in loaded-combat anyway), then a system to simply apply some 'Random-Damage' to a ship might...

why is that ?

I like these ideas, but; the 'bomb' weapon (fully exploited: eg; point-blank bomb-waffle brick) ) might pose big problems to non-homebase structures, no ? :/

Weapons 2.0 - :/ Clearly some hard work has gone into the new damage and hit/scan models, and I can imagine that some of this fits well with AI and NPC behaviors and actions. (or does it ...?) There are other good things in there also … BUT overall, the new weapons system/targeting massively...

Eggshell + Hammer ...

Firstly, Thank You Dev team for the update :) ... been so quiet I nearly missed it :O I am testing it out - and these are preliminary comments to expand on; The work done on time-spread/acid-damage models is important and needs real time testing in populated servers to judge effectiveness for...

...and, OMG, the lag .....

well yes - assuming better beam aim ... i suppose actual flak missiles/dummies, or interceptor missiles would be nice (but load heavy??) manually laser-guided missiles would be a neat player feature also.

Cannon only anti-missile turrets is becoming a daft concept: Other 'in-game tech' is way out of step with hurling marbles and flak :/ And there is a clear meta to counter, ie;

oh, just buy it and support further Development - at worst it is hardly the biggest spend... :)