Search results

-:schema: "If necessary the internal size of blocks can be expanded from 3 to 4 bytes" :eek::cool:

The problem is, this feels kinda lazy. I'm sure there's plenty of other mechanics that can be introduced to make crew something helpful without just arbitrarily buffing crewed ships. Am I the only one who feels that crew just sitting at stations and passively buffing the ship doesn't feel...

Yikes. That's a lot of pipes.

That wraparound, whoa. I wondered about this before. I wonder how the game reacts if you impulse at insane speed to the last sector's own "end of the universe". I guess it wouldn't have any interesting generation bugs though, with nothing to generate. Also, that is the perfect music for this...

Regarding the oreos, there is, to me at least, one advantage: a large terrain surface to land, move, and build on.(with fps, not spf.) I would like the oreos to be a config option. I do think the current planets are much better, but I'd like to have both for different reasons. I have a toaster...

*looks at page number*:eek: Anyway, a lot of the buffs seem to be artificial "use the crew now, dangit!". Even if I want to use crew, that's just going to make me annoyed with them anyway. I'd rather they do things, than have the existing systems require them. I.E. repairs, comms, translation...

We'll have things more dangerous than sharks to play with in the future. :D

this please all of my want

... Perhaps we can just make computers cost less across the board, and give a little bit more stuff to a starting player? Would be a nice change.

I like the idea of balancing it, but personally would prefer making larger ships easier to decloak: thus small ships can hide and run easier, giving them a useful role. I think it should be an effect system, with different effects at different percentages, and perhaps ramping power requirements...

Basically, transporter rings ala Stargate? Those would be nice.

I haven't played multi-player in a while, and wasn't far enough into it to PvP, so I'll be a broken record here, but; I think the max viable size of ship needs to be turned down. Don't just let people grind themselves to death, or they will(See: Hax's hand injury, SSBM). If people can build...

Sadly, that's kinda the way swarmers are right now(are they really even good anyway?)...

Pirate bases do give too little, besides silly farming of Isanths. Loot should definitely be improved, right now it's tedious to get and sort, and also difficult to locate. Randomness belongs in loot chests only, and even then it should be somewhat controlled. Scrap salvaging should instead...

Thanks for that picture, mine usually look more like checkerboard lines, but that might work better(besides super-long stick-ships). Learn something new all the time, no matter having been here since the days of waffle AMCs, and the old textures.

Somehow I feel this wouldn't work well, such as having decoy missiles spew out of your ship at the sides, using vertical launch tubes, and large turret turn times. If PD gets increased accuracy, I'm sure they'll keep it from bleeding over(missiles could use a hitbox increase instead?), or fix it...

Note:If you set rail speed to 0, it will reduce lag. You'll have to look about that, don't remember exactly how.

Another note: you probably want to factor weapons penetration and per-reactor-block efficiency into your reactor designs, making these probably sub-optimal for actual use anyway.

I think these power cube things should be removed from all the wikis(Even horribly outdated ones), they're causing too much confusion.

I think we could use a setting for how lenient the procedural system is. So parts could have a rating of fittingness, if you set the fauna config to 1, it goes completely wacko random, .5, it does as is intended, 0, it's very strict or uses preset only. I wonder if the game could determine a...