Search results

I disagree. Voter fatigue means people further down the ballot are less likely to receive a vote from a voter reading a candidates policies on the spot. It's much more fair to have it randomized, to limit the chances of someone having a higher chance of being skipped just for having a name...

Oh, sorry. This quote made it seem like you were abandoning SS for complete dedication to GenX, as opposed to a split dedication.

Due to how the warping works, it would cause tall building to warp with the planet, and since it's a visual distortion, ships and projectiles would ALSO get distorted. That might be a cool effect for blackholes to have, but not normal planets.

The point is that you get frozen in place if you're an astronaut, and you can't do it in a ship if you're not an admin, specifically to prevent using it to get through walls. You might be able to move while an admin, though.

Does it work for you when you're not an admin?

And what happens if the entire planet gets eaten and the core gets nuked?

I think you don't understand the scale at which factions devour planets. My faction frequently eats multiple solar systems A DAY. The loss of a planet's worth of resources is something you can laugh off. By decreasing the amount of resources you can get from a planet, you're just going to...

Maybe in singleplayer, but in multiplayer? As if there isn't already enough reason to ditch the spawn galaxy.

That wasn't an experiment with cube planets. That was the un-warped base for the spherical planets test. Regardless, really not a fan of cube planets. As for everything else- I like it, except for the massive number of barren worlds over living worlds. There should definitely be barren worlds...

Does that work? I'm pretty sure you get frozen in place when you do that.

Minelayers pls Does this mean AI will be able to use passives? Additionally, with the scanner on the fighter, does this mean AI will be able to use scanners?

I think he's saying you should be able to save a waypoint without needing to physically be in the sector when you do it. Which sounds like a great idea to me.

I thought Atlas wasn't part of the Pact anymore?

Jammers don't work against swarmers. Additionally, I was saying that anyone being inhibited by these things would be able to SCAN and find the things and kill them.

Did you vote in the Council elections?

Did you? Feel free to comment with why you did or did not vote this time around.

Having to undock it first has literally zero effect on any of that. You can remove the rail and kill a personal ship on the HB perfectly fine, regardless of whether it was docked when set to personal or not.

You're making solutions to something that isn't a problem. Explain why people shouldn't be able to set something to personal while it's docked to a HB.

Lock-on missile turrets ignore jamming, unfortunately. A cloaker will not be able to support a large inhibitor, either. And finally, SCANNERS EXIST.