Search results

I like that challenge, thanks :) From green-to-red, there is an obstruction from top-to-bottom spanning all but 2 fields. The first impact would be green shifted 4 fields right, from which the algorithm would go top/bottom and see that the obstruction is 23-of-25, because that is the vertical...

WRONG Do you even read my things before you reply? Because then you would know that SM isn't a single fee. 1 user, 1 fee; 100 users, 100 fees. And you don't purchase a product, you purchase "the service to use the product legally" which can be cancelled when you violate AGBs without in a way...

A nice visualisation, but it has all algorithms searching unnecessary fields behind the start point when I have this setup: // b a Z A B C D E F G -2 O O O O O O O O O O -1 O O O O O O O O # O ±0 O O A O O O O # O O +1 O O O O O # # O O O +2 O O O O O # O O O O +3 O O O # # O O O O O +4 O O O #...

Perhaps they just (ab)use us for doing all the error-detection stuff. It's a waste of man-power to let peoples do it which do not know a thing about the code. And it's a waste to build on top of a broken system. As soon as I see a project which works perfectly ground-up, is free and makes my...

UserA says: Shine, the subject is objective! UserB says: |¯¯¯¯¯(QUOTE="UserA")¯¯¯¯¯¯ | | :quad::daveeek::whale:Shine, the subject is objective! :whistle::schema: | | –––––(REPLY)–––––––––——— | | :davecool::mechbird: I got it! I got it! | |______(RESPONSE)––––––––––– | | :dave::whale: Thanks...

They did, but indirectly via block-count and weight/build/supply-cost of support-modules. So you already provided the answer yourself: They implemented it for doors, but forgot about shield-exploits. Agree. Non-consent ©opy-Restrictions, (U)se-Restrictions, $hare-Restrictions...

(1+2) Maybe they expected it to only be used between multiple separately target-able ships. (3) Maybe they expected it to lose 10% power on that way and didn't thought about increasing it when changing the soft-cap on power-regen. (5) Maybe you are a higher-dimensional being, exploiting...

1st=yaw;way; space-time (1 second ~ (6+1)x around earth - fits perfectly with hexagons and platonic solids) 2nd=roll; whole dimension = 360° or 2(PI)rad divided among n*integers 3rd=pitch; half dimension = 180° or (PI)rad divided among (n/2)*integers 4th=scale; time-logarithmic dimension...

You still have to have a display block somewhere around 3m infront and 5m left/right, depending on view angle.

Are we living in time-space or in space-time? a_st·and·ard_ath & standard is a re·al(l) word 1_st·2nd·3rd_4th s=space = light-seconds (about 280'000km/s ) t=time = seconds n=360° = ~ 40'000km r=180°; n=r+r=360° = inner/outer surface of a torus-world d=dimension (radial between 0…1 or 0…360° or...

Only 50% on pierce? One armour layer isn't much on a 200m thick ship so it equates to about 1/4 of 50% vs 4 layers.

All answers here: Perfect Planet solution | Seed of Andromeda Forums Just check out sacret geometry and shaders. Then try to program collision matching rendering and you can use graphic cards for collision-checks on spherical bump-maps. Collision+Rendering+BlockData = A game where you can crash...

Today, rarely someone talks about Earth as Flat-Earth. Everybody is happy that the church doesn't prosecute peoples who says something about a Sphere-Earth. OK, why do we not go one step further and introduce Hollow-Earth-Plane'ts? It would fix a lot of problems to make Planet-cylinders with...

You forgot the interrogation and the BD-SM room. I don't know how much it impairs your vision by using display-blocks, but this is not the optimal solution as long as the display-blocks themselves are rendered fully (not just their text like with grass-sprites)

I'd like the x0z axis to light up like the build-mode-symmetry. If you don't like roll, you could align to that one.