- Joined
- Feb 25, 2016
- Messages
- 1,362
- Reaction score
- 268
Just going to point out that my statement is geared towards saying that anyone who is willing to put the time in to make a good ship will, most likely, produce a better ship, because they'll want their good-looking ship to be good all around. Usually.Depends on the builder, and on what you mean by beautiful
There is beauty in power, etc. Let's say that a ship has to please it's builder to be worth it.
I'm not going to let this stand without comment. Even putting aside concept builds for a moment, this is patently absurd. Your argument is the logical equivalent of saying that poets must be good painters, since both require creativity. If someone has a very clever idea of how to structure their weapons, and that is the reason they're building the ship, what is wrong with building their complex system into a simple shape? If they aren't interested in aesthetics, why shouldn't they build in gray? I know why I don't, but I don't belittle people if they do.
To be clear, I don't think that effectiveness has to be compromised for beauty, but I do think the above quoted paragraph is at least as fallacious as anything the OP has said. Also, now I want to build a brick just to prove you wrong.
If you intend to make a brick, then you're putting effort in. If your ship becomes a brick because you didn't put the effort in add something, well, how much effort are you likely to have put into everything else?
How do you optimize a bookshelf? Automatic sorting? I mean, a shelf is a shelf is a shelf, right?Well now, that's a pretty fun buzz word.
I've found that 90% or more of players who say 'completely optimized' aren't able to optimize a bookshelf, much less a ship.