Search results

This is a missing feature in my opinion. It's such a glaring oversight that it's almost a bug.

Already confirmed in some way, shape, or form. Good ideas.

Sure I do. It just has to be a glass cannon with no hull or any decoration to speak of. That's what I don't like. I want a ship to look like a ship not like...

Username: Valiant70 Style: Sensible (reflecting functionality), anywhere between light or dark, atypical features, logic functions Qualities: Fusion of appealing aesthetics and immersion with highly refined functionality and systems AAA ship development Excellent and sometimes extraordinary...

I agree with Omni. A human male is a human male. End of story. Adding more default skins would be a waste of time. I'd rather see a female character model added since that can't exactly be added by a player.

The current behavior sounds more or less like a bug. I kind of doubt that was intended.

I wouldn't say it's perfect, but it would be better than what we have now if stealth ships could be made somewhat pretty. Point of fact, though: stealth ships are already not viable in combat. However, I would welcome anything that could potentially make stealth ships look more like ships and...

Whichever way you rotate it.

The only things worthwhile I've seen here are a female default model (and a female mesh for that matter) and variety for shop NPCs. Make my default char a Mongolian-Korean mix for all I care. Shoot, I might as well complain that there's no Dave with a beard and that I don't want to play a...

Requesting thread lock!

I see. I definitely agree with the name change, but I don't see any particular reason to remove the weak push because it would seem a nice touch for a ship to get a slight nudge when this big wave of energy/forcefield/sci-magick/whatever hits it.

That sounds interesting. The drawback to nerfing drone spam is that the whole idea of drone spam motivates the use of done-swatting fighters. Ship-mounted turrets are generally bad flyswatters. This is a good idea, but I'd be careful of being too hard on the drone swarms.

I did not say or imply that, or otherwise make that assertion in any way, shape, or form. There is a problem with planets right now - they are too rich in resources compared to asteroids, leading players to shred entire planets with massive salvage arrays while turning their noses up at the...

I like this idea. That would be useful on a large ship for "stunning" drones and slowing them down enough for turrets to pick some off. As of now, drone swarms are quite strong.

*mashes imaginary disagree button* Reason: Imbalanced, makes a current problem worse

No. That is opinion only, and your opinion is wrong in my opinion. ;)

That's really no different from uncloaked doom-cubes. The Ragnarok Galaxy server despawns such vessels on sight, which I think all servers should do except in battle mode.

Please stop making a fool of yourself. This is plain ridiculous. Just stop. There is no reason for this. You should put your previous picture back and yell "IN YOUR FACE" to people being trolls/bullies. The picture was in no way objectionable in any rational way, and did not violate any...

BIG, RED, ALL-CAPS, BOLD, ITALLICIZED, UNDERLINED "NOPE!" I'm okay with it being partially visible close up, but 2km is waaaaaaay too far. 100-200m is more reasonable. If cloaking does not make a ship invisible, it is pointless. Previews work, but atmospheres do not. Only rendering x% of...

The current engine does not support flowing liquid, but that doesn't mean fluids can't LOOK like they move! Water should be animated. The top/bottom can just ripple. The sides could appear to flow downward for decorative waterfalls and fountains, although if it flows downward behind glass...