Search results

Uh... eh? Star Trek bridges are actually external... That odd knob on the top of a Star Trek ship's saucer section is the bridge.

That was already true. Someone could just shoot at your ship until it dies, for griefing or to actually steal the ship, if it wasn't homebase protected... Ever since I got on here having a home base somewhere has been very much necessary.

Yeah, that works. I'd think, anyway, that if you just used some kind of fancy gravity manipulation tech to grab onto an enemy ship and magically change your inertial frame while keeping relative trajectory (or lack thereof) it would probably emit some kind of signature that funky futuristic...

No need. A boarding pod just has to grapple on (Align, not physically stick to the ship), then sit near enough to the ship that the boarders can exit, cut their way into the ship, and slip in, without getting flattened by all the big pew pewy stuff going on under/around/overhead. Bonus points if...

Currently, if I wished to board an enemy ship, I would have to somehow be flown close enough to grapple on. This probably means hitching a ride on a boarding pod piloted by another player (Or AI with a bit of hacking, but that's risky; AI is really easy to shoot down.) So I thought, what if...

Oh, that's a bit more sane. I misread the part that said "without its shields" as "without dropping its shields" for some reason.

Of all the bugs that could... wow. Torch code changes spilled over into damage pulse? (This is a bug... right?)

Not even necessary; just build a big rail panel in the hull that slides away when you need to pop in a new reactor. Or, hell, build a not-big panel. Just have it slide away and create enough space to shove a docker beam through. The reactor just teleports in that way.

Yeah, I suppose so; it's kind of like the doomcube thing. But if, say, crew members had to get between the core and something else, then that might make it extremely inconvenient to do that sort of thing except maybe by hand as a last-minute barricade during a battle.

This... is a really closed-minded argument. StarMade is still in alpha and honestly, it hasn't yet decided which direction it's going in. As to the actual suggestion, maybe. The only problem is that, as the OP said, this would effectively be a buff to bigger ships, which have more space to hide...

...Shipyards system? No more building shit in the middle of nowhere. A bit strict, I suppose, but it definitely fixes issues like this.

I... really don't want fuel, honestly. No matter what, it'll just be a pain in the ass and result in getting stuck out in space. If we get some mechanics to replace the benefits of linear damping without keeping the damping itself, then maybe, but even then I don't want to find myself drifting...

Dayum, these are cool. A big cloaker with a hull, a Starfury (Yay, Starfuries!), and a battleship... If that battleship is an original design, then props to you for creating a reasonably original, but still awesome-looking, design in a game where so many tons of designs have been tried... :D

Mojang... at the time that they fixed it? About three developers working on MC, if memory serves, maybe less... And Schema apparently works on StarMade for like 10 hours a day, so no. The issue here is priority, not capability.

Eh, I like realism where it's either convenient, or adds to immersion without making things really really boring.

That would be cool but cannot and will not work.. There's no stably orbiting a dodecahedronal tiled gravity field, at least with the way gravity currently works. You always gain more speed than gravity allows for and go flying off into extraorbital space..

Yeah, I'm considering making a "Frankenstein" pack that uses the old Realistic textures with the new blocks from Default as well as the far-superior hull textures from Default... But meh, laziness.

Yes, most players cry because necessary game mechanics to comfortably play without it don't exist. I like it, personally, but nobody wants to lose a ship because of a glitch sending it floating away randomly. There needs to be some way for ships to automatically stop if there's nobody in them...

Hm, well, first of all, you applied wrong. At the bottom of a thread page, there's a blank where you can reply, that looks like this: ...Which is supposed to be where you write your application. Within the faction thread, in a post. Not as a new thread. Second of all, as to the actual...

The problem isn't resource acquisition, ATM getting resources is grindy and annoying and making it harder is a terrible idea. The problem is that once you have a titan, it's an indestructable gigafortress and can only be taken out by another titan, or a massive swarm - a massive swarm usually...