Search results

Ok well it's one of those cases where rebuilding it would take way longer than just updating ths systems. And I keep stuff mostly up to date so it's not that bad when I only need to make a singlw change. On the other hand, nuclear has a design line. For the battleship style ships he's basically...

Right? Why redo it when you can just build a new and improved version :D

A bit late to the party, but here's my opinion: Looks pretty cool tbh. There are some clear upsides to having less blocks, like actual system design, moar interior, vastly better synergy with crew (once they're added), and especially LESS F******G LAG OH GOD YES PLEASE. But I can see why some...

I'm not dead btw, just lacking motivation to play the game atm.

Wait I don't see any sha-... oh... Oh my.... Those are some sexy ships you got there

And it doesn't incinerate the server?????? HOW?

I have a 360° fov turret on my 1.28km long ship. However, even if nothing collides, I still get ~15fps while the turret moves around because of collision checks. And that's with a ship half the lenght of yours. What you're asking for is possible in theory, but not in practice: Your computer...

Yea, I have yet to test it with full systems and all the turrets active but my guess is that it'd drop me to 5-10fps on my desktop.

30fps is not the limit, that's a myth. It's only true in case of something flickering, where you can't notice things flickering beyond x amount of hertz (ex: a light). There's a definite difference with things in motion on a screen though. I have a 144hz monitor on my desktop, and fast moving...

Currently refitting the reactors. At 35fps it's painful (on my laptop), but I'm getting there! I'm probably going to have to change the layout of the reactor room because one it's corners gets uncomfortably close to the exterior. Basically, I'm working on this thing again.

Yes and no. Is the range of beams too limited? Maybe. However, you have to keep in mind that beams are hit-scan, meaning that it's possible to place a lot more accurate shots on target than with cannons. If you can aim well you'll basically be missing a lot less with beams than with cannons...

Uh... no you didn't. The fact that schine wasn't reading suggestions is a big part of why the council was created in the first place.

It was definitely not. The devs have stated multiple times that the ability for docked reactors to be used to boost a ship past the power cap were never an intended feature. That's also why THEY WERE COMPLETELY DISABLED in the last update. In any case, unless you're on a server that turned the...

Very nice! I'm sure that a lot of the people that enjoy re-creating ships from other series will be very happy to have this!

Chunks not saving happens extremely rarely, as unfortunate as it is. I suggest that you make blueprint backups to avoid issues (always make backups). At least it's just raw systems (and in a straight line at that), it's not like you had hull or anything around it, so it shouldn't take too long...

I'm saying armor layers outside AND inside of it (weaved into it). Nowhere did I mention that it'd be docked, that'd produce more lag than docked reactors.

It definitely is, lol. Standard armor, I like the looks of it better. Thanks! I'll check that ship of yours out :D :P

I won't lie, while they may seem shitty at times, the collisions in starmade areactualluy pretty well optimized (especially since the last updates). Compared to space engineers's collisions (taking ship size and block count into account), it is perfection incarnate. Seriously, it could be much...

The reactor is docked to the ship, all is going well, no lag. xXCreeperKiller2006Xx pulls up in a shitbrick, and starts shooting the ship with the docked reactor. The reactor's rail docker or rail gets shot, gets obliterated, and the reactor undocks. The docked reactor starts bouncing around...

That's very true, good observation. The update post should have been more specific on the goals of the new block to avoid confusion.