Search results

How does this work, exactly? We don't have an oxygen system. All I see is people filling their hallways with extinguishers to put out any fires that start inside their hallways. How is this useful for boarders? As for shooting something at a ship to make it stop... it's called Stop. EMP effect.

I wanted to be able to create warhead railguns with the new launch rails. Sadly, it isn't very practical with a 25m/s launch speed, even if it does get additive speed. I'd like it if we could get these all the way up to server max, at minimum.

It's more immersive to be able to detonate your entire ship with a single block rather than needing to wire it with explosives? Do I know you? Did I piss you off in some way forever ago? Take it to PMs if you've got a problem, bro.

If you want a self-destruct sequence, rig your ship to explode with warheads. Was this necessary? You already have this stuff in your normal sig.

Don't you normally need a consent form for human test subjects? I'm reporting you to the police for ethics violations.

That's in Google Sheets.

This document is now 24 pages long. It's starting to get a little laggy to scroll through on mobile, and it takes forever to load everything every time I want to view a different edit in the revision history. I'm going to be cutting the document up into 4- 2011/2012/2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016...

I decided to send them some wonderful pixel art as a gift to repay their generous donations.

Wow, that is huge... I bet lots of Unnamed's can live there... probably at least 25. Unnamed25

25% is not a third. That's a fourth. Nauvran and Thadius aren't Thryn members, genius. I'm not sure why you're calling us "forum warriors" when you're doing more "forum warrioring" than I am.

Even a shitty inhibitor prevents you from "accidentally" firing off your JD. >scratch some paint on an armor tank >call it a curbstomp

Factionlocked fleets are not the default setting. Did someone else take control of your core ships?

It's rather difficult to "accidentally" jump out when you're being actively inhibed. Gotta purposefully hold that left mouse button down and then right click, you know? And I guess it's just a coincidence that you happened to jump out just as your shields got low?

Sure. I'm no interior design master, but I think it looks good. I find it's a good way to indicate hazards without the annoyingly bright yellow hazard that pulls attention away from the rest of the details.

I use them for the interior of airlocks sometimes.

No, for two reasons. 1- Multiple projectiles = more lag. 2- Easy bypass of penetration diminishing returns. Unless you can think of a balanced solution to that problem, this is even more of a no.

This is false. The admins never gave us anything (except a TP to spawn once when the command teleported someone to 2 2000 2 or something). This is false. I asked Bobby Bighoof himself on the matter when Zoro came into SMD chat on an alt saying we did, and he said there was zero proof that...

How does this encourage minmaxing? Also, small ships are already massively more maneuverable, especially with overdrive and passive push/pull. Except those modules are directly on the turret, not on the main ship. It's more like how the transfer beams have an efficiency loss. You decide how...

Huh. You know, I just checked, and T/M ratio is capped at 2.5. I'm almost certain it did not used to be like that. EDIT- Regardless, why do you even want a ship with that high a T/M ratio? It's impossible to get a ship that's remotely combat viable with that much thrust. Why does the game...

Who knows? Why do you care? It's there for balance purposes. Maybe shield capacitors can only protect a ship until it gets drained to 25% because [insert technobabble here]. Why does this matter? This applies to all of your points here. With default game settings, the 4.5x max server speed you...