Search results

I'm thinking that if you added a penalty of self-disruption (guaranteed) and the attack only had the chance of disruption, might get something pretty balanced. (provided turrets disrupt the mothership.)

True. But with multiple missile computers you could fire one after the other, and get the same effect. I'm just saying its annoying to fire a volley, wait 6 seconds, fire a volley, wait 6 seconds, fire a volley, wait 6 seconds, fire a volley, wait 6 seconds, fire a volley, wait 6 seconds, as...

I wouldn't mind having a different symbol for turrets while in my field of view, but having all of those symbols on the side is a pain.

Nice style for the catpults. How big are those, btw? Also, how big is your city-ship going to get?

I'm also concerned about ships with a high thrust/mass ratio trying to dock and just whacking something at full speed.

Those turrets look nice. Also you can move all the thrusters outside the hull so you have more interior space. Then when the user places the turret they remove the thrusters. I'm redoing my own turret designs after I realized I could do that.

What's that "desired number" ? Seriously, with the cube root of the BF:group ratio as the shot count, you need 27 per group to get 3 shots. To get 4, 64. The size of the BF group will get pretty large if you get a larger burst count. If you are honestly concerned about someone crashing the...

That is why we need some form of limitation, and enhancers are the most intuituve system we have. Using a GUI would require less sacrifice of ship capability, and just removing it would be completely OP.

It is also game-imbalancing. That's why we need some form of enhancers.

NeonSturm A fixed bridge model? Not a fan of that idea. I would say that the radar should exist as a way of tracking things beyond loading range. Astrocat Hey that's a nice idea. A version of build mode cam, except you can change which type of blocks are visible or not, and then select and edit...

I was thinking that it would work using the linking system.

Eh, the difference between a stenciled piece of metal and a glowing holographic monitor should be as simple as a texture pack change.

Draeke_Forther Well if you were trying to deploy 70 missile turrets all at once for a huge missile swarm, that would be something that should take a huge amount of power. Opening a hanger door? hardly a concern for being OP. @Neonstrum Well the entire point of the cosmetic parts is that there...

Well, what is the "desired amount of shots?" it depends on the application, and should come at a cost. If I decide that a 3-round burst is what I want, then I only need put 27 BF blocks per weapon group. Are what you saying is that the number of shots should also depend on the size of the weapon...

We have tags, so we should be able to do things like #original, #inspired, #replica Still, being able to sort by stats would be good.

"units would have to change as you gained speed" ... ... WHUT What is that suppose to mean I don't even just WHUT anyway, the planets are about 400m across. Yes, the planets are really small. That is something that should change. However, it makes more sense for there to be tiny planets...

http://oldsite.star-made.org/content/new-years-news

I would prefer the units be in meters/second. Far more useful when we have to manuver at close ranges.

The lines are very prominant/high contrast/attention-stealing, at least on the white. The gray (or is that black) fares better.

Not only that, there will be a solid ring of color that blocks what's in the 4-7 hotbar slots.