Search results

I got your alerts at the exact same moment. Are you two just wired directly into the SMD?

So which does everyone think is going to be finished first, the Charon or Starmade itself?

If you must insist on making a pointless complaint thread that contributes nothing and shows total ignorance of what's actually going on at shine and the multiple times they have stated that the game is NOT FINISHED, at least learn how to use proper spelling and grammar.

Do they involve the abyss staring back at you?

Well, perhaps it would be more accurate to have pirates inhabiting systems surrounding resource rich ones. Or at the edges of them. Your right, pirates don't hang out ten feet from a trade port, but they also don't hang out in antarctica. There has to be wealth to steal within a reasonable...

The games design doesn't seem coherent because its not finished. What schine basically seems to be doing is starting with each of the various aspects of what the game will be and building inward until they all meet into one complete game.

I don't really feel though like that makes any sense. Pirates would seem to logically congregate around resources, so they can raid, pillage, plunder, and otherwise pilfer their weasely black guts out. But there's nothing in void space. What if, instead, some systems had more resources...

More like cannon/pulse/explosive that doesn't suck is I think what he's going for. All we really need for this is for explosive to actually be explosive, and not just send damage into the void.

Changing your sig doesn't make this any less of a horribly unbalanced idea.

Fighters being useless might be what was shown in that episode, but it sure wasn't what was shown in multiple instances in voyager and DS9. Starfleet ships CAN miss, depending on the epidode and series in question. Also, if the galaxies warp core was so reliable, how come something went wrong...

Now see that could work, but instead of having it switch out the modules, it would be much easier to just have the AI be able to choose from a list of ships what best suits the situation.

I.. don't think that is possible. AI's that learn are still super new in terms of existing at all. I don't know if there are ANY games with leaning AI. The closest thing to it would be RTS game AI's that build units to counter the ones player's make, but that's not learning, that's just a simple...

That turret's so big it needs it's own thermal exhaust port.

Honestly though, how many games where the AI is ever asked to pathfind around any sort of obstacles where the AI doesn't get stuck on random crap all the time?

Beam coloring is a longstanding issue that is on the dev's list.... somewhere. I imagine we will eventually get a big update for all the weapons effects, doing things like adding an actual missile to missiles, scaling cannon and beam size to damage batter, Ect. Soontm.

Yes, we know that.

I basically agree with Lecic on this one. This would make dumb fire missiles pretty much useless, and make other missiles a good deal less useful. Not only that, but this would be an ENORMOUS nerf to armor. Pretty much any decent-sized cannon can go through several layers of advanced armor. But...

There should also be setting for turrets regarding targeting ships of different masses. Something like: -Prioritize ships < X mass. -Prioritize ships > X mass -Do not target if < X mass -Do not target if > X mass

I like that. Yes, it needs to have something to do with schemadyne or Dr. plex, those old heroes of starmade that launched the space age.

Let's not just slap together some sciency-sounding words please. I HATE when scifis just slap together some science-type words with no regard for their actual meaning. A quantum-tachyon-polarizer, or a subspace-plasma coil, just makes NO. GOD. DAMMED. SENSE. Why star trek? Why do you do this...