\"Total War cannot be engaged without some kind of perceived threat, coupled by provocation by the one whom war is declared against. \"
As it is written to me, it doesn\'t say specifically if the concord or its existence gets attacked. The provocation bu whom war is declared against can easily mean the concord itself, any member or members of the concord. As it is written it doesn\'t exactly mention and limit the specific entity to the concord itself. But I understand its being interrupted different and in a specific way.
Wait would a threat to the concord gives the opening and chance for the senate to call for total war, now that\'s will an threat to the concord and attacks on its members. You say that \"total war declaration can not stand,\" but would it be stand.
the next part is clear and is one thing I do like and agree with. That prevents large conflicts and maintains other factions bugbor small to remain out of conflicts if they choose to.
the fleet is for power simple as that. Instead of individual faction fleets a consolidated fleet and members. The concord must have power and reach if it is to succeed against other alliances and factions.
pact lite with votes.. Lol. Ts requirement, a mix, age limit, and attend meetings. Its not that bad requirements. I assume many of your members dislike the factions and certain personal inside of it. That\'s is what happens I guess.
I mention the total war part and focus on I, because in time, leader or certain events it can be interpreted as such and be used as I stated, without it being specific, it leave room for interruption. As legolos saw it as such and wanted to call a vote on.. On total war, which is why I commented in the first place.
nice post btw.
