Nuclear Power structures

    Darkkon

    The Harlequin Builder
    Joined
    Jun 28, 2013
    Messages
    155
    Reaction score
    20
    • Legacy Citizen 3
    I really like this idea, even if we do need to have a specific structure for it to work. I don't really see the issue with it needing to have a specific structure anyway. You don't NEED this power system to run your ship, we still have the default reactors and capacitors. This would be an optional power boost for ships with a few different mechanics from the current system. As for it damaging astronauts, im both for and against that idea. I like it on the grounds that you would need to protect against the radiation, however it can be very annoying to work with if it does damage over time.
     

    JonasWalker

    Old Newb
    Joined
    Jul 9, 2013
    Messages
    101
    Reaction score
    19
    • Legacy Citizen 6
    • Purchased!
    I really like this idea, even if we do need to have a specific structure for it to work. I don't really see the issue with it needing to have a specific structure anyway. You don't NEED this power system to run your ship, we still have the default reactors and capacitors. This would be an optional power boost for ships with a few different mechanics from the current system. As for it damaging astronauts, im both for and against that idea. I like it on the grounds that you would need to protect against the radiation, however it can be very annoying to work with if it does damage over time.
    As said though, think of the weapon potential. Have guests? Time to flood your ship with hard ionizing radiation. ;) :D
     

    Darkkon

    The Harlequin Builder
    Joined
    Jun 28, 2013
    Messages
    155
    Reaction score
    20
    • Legacy Citizen 3
    As said though, think of the weapon potential. Have guests? Time to flood your ship with hard ionizing radiation. ;) :D
    I Imagine that would be better as its own set of blocks, set up with their own computers so that you can use logic to control them.
     

    jayman38

    Precentor-Primus, pro-tempore
    Joined
    Jul 13, 2014
    Messages
    2,518
    Reaction score
    787
    • Purchased!
    • Thinking Positive
    • Legacy Citizen 4
    Instead of damaging astronauts, maybe make the enhanced reactors negatively effect crew morale, so that some other function, such as food, medicine, and/or other morale-boosting features would be needed on-board to balance the morale effect. This requirement (additional required RP blocks/rooms/etc.) alone would probably be enough to offset any boost that the enhanced reactor would provide. One may find that the additional RP requirement is not worth having the enhanced reactor and would instead opt for the old (currently existing) power design.
     
    Joined
    Aug 31, 2013
    Messages
    635
    Reaction score
    875
    • Competition Winner - Small Fleets
    • Legacy Citizen 9
    • Master Builder Bronze
    how about reactors that passively draw massive amounts of energy from the ship to function in order to deliver a % power generation bonus?
    so basically, the reactors have an exponential curve for power amplification but a linear power cost that is so intense/extreme that trying to use the reactors on ships with fewer than 1 million native power generation will consume more power than it produces, while on ships with exactly 1 million native power generation, it will produce as much power as it consumes, and then on a ship producing more than 1 million, it can produce more than it consumes. up to 2x the native power generation at 2 million native power generation. the system would be composed of a "Reactor Amplifier computer" and the bullk: "Reactor Amplifier modules"

    the math would work out as:

    maximum power amplification = (power generation)/1,000,000 = power amplifier multiplier
    so for 500,000 e/s, using a maximized power amplifier reactor, you would have a maximum of 0.5x your native power generation, meaning that your ship would consume 500,000 e/s running this system, and then spit out 250,000 e/s

    at 1000,000 e/s using a maximized power amplifier reactor, you'd have a maximum of 1x your native power generation, meaning that your ship would consume 1,000,000 e/s running this system and spit out 1,000,000 e/s

    at 2,000,000 e/s using a maximized power amplifier reactor, you'd have a maximum of 2x your native power generation, meaning that your ship would consume 2,000,000 e/s running this system and spit out 4,000,000 e/s

    The power amplification system would be configured such that its (total block count/groups)/12.5% of your ship's block count would equal the % of your native power generation that would be affected by it when activated. if the power amplification system is a single group that equals 12.5% of your ship's block count, then it acts upon all 100% of your ship's native power generation. if it equals 6.25% of your ship's total block count, or is 12.5% of your ship's block count comprised of two groups, then it acts upon 50% of your ship's native power generation.

    The amplification would be a system that consumes "cooling capacity" which is yet again, another ship system as part of this ecosystem. The total cooling capacity would be comprised of "radiators" and "heat capacitors". radiators produce cooling capacity, and heat capacitors increase the ship's cooling capacity maximum. radiators would build cooling capacity very slowly while heat capacitors would build maximum cooling capacity at a linear rate. This is similar to power reactor modules and power capacitor modules currently in-game. radiator blocks would require being placed such that at least 1 face of the block is un-covered and at least 1 face of the block is covered. each radiator block would function best with up to 5 faces of the block are un-covered, and the cooling generated scaled by the block's uncovered face count

    when activated, the power amplification system consumes cooling capacity until it reaches 20%, and then turns off . You may activate the power amplification any time, just you must keep in mind your cooling capacity, which is very likely to be unable to sustain the power amplification indefinitely. the cooling capacity reactors consume power in order to generate cooling capacity, so trying to make an indefinitely sustainable power amplification system would reduce your total free power produced by the power amplification in the first place. while the amplification is switched off, cooling capacity increases until your ship is at maximum. if your ship's cooling capacity drops to zero, the ship would then undergo a power generation cut to 50% until your cooling capacity recharged to 20% of your maximum cooling capacity.

    sectors could be given heat ratings which consume ship cooling capacity. stars sectors would consume ship cooling capacity at some amount that is easily manageable for a large ship with a large cooling system, and each sector in distance away from the star sector would consume an exponentially lower amount of cooling capacity, with void sectors consuming none. this would mean that the power amplification strategies would need to consider their location when using this system, and ships with very strong cooling could retreat strategically into high heat systems in order to deter pursuers. Shipbuilding could be done in any sector, however, the hotter the sector, the more cooling capacity that the shipyard would need to function at maximum performance

    entities would handle cooling capacity needs of ships docked to the main entity with the docked entities' cooling system being used when the main ship's cooling system drops below 20%

    implications: block-loss damage to your ship would increase the % of power generation that the amplification would act upon, increasing cooling capacity usage, decreasing amplification viability.

    amplification blocks would be explosive like warheads, radiators would be weak points/vulnerable and this would bring some more location-based strategic elements into the game.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Kaisaurus
    Joined
    Feb 25, 2016
    Messages
    1,362
    Reaction score
    268
    I'm opposed to a multiplier. This is a nuclear reactor we're talking about, not another method of mystically producing energy (More energy, in this case) from the void.
     
    Joined
    Apr 7, 2015
    Messages
    50
    Reaction score
    84
    • Community Content - Bronze 1
    • Competition Winner - Small Fleets
    • Legacy Citizen 5
    I would agree that having the reactors as amplifiers would not make sense in terms of this being a nuclear reactor - maybe as a separate computer system to be implemented, but they would essentially make nuclear reactors dependent on having full power already. My idea of nuclear power would be to have a superior tier of power offset by its complicated nature and specific drawbacks.

    Ideally this would lead to even more nuanced ship building/piloting.