Game Balance Suggestions

    Discussion in 'Suggestions' started by CIR, Nov 28, 2015.

    1. Lecic

      Lecic Convicted Lancake Abuser

      Joined:
      Apr 14, 2013
      Messages:
      5,101
      You know do know EMP is already extremely effective at causing a complete power failure and fully immobilizing a ship, right?
       
    2. Ghent96

      Joined:
      Mar 15, 2014
      Messages:
      235
      Ditto that. Emp is very good as is. Let's focus on getting core parts of the game working before we tweak stats. An "empDisables" Boolean value in the config might not be a bad idea, to enable server admins to, further customize gameplay, but that's it for now.
       
    3. wizardoftrash

      Joined:
      Apr 26, 2017
      Messages:
      32
      To my knowledge, EMP has no effect on a ship that still has shields up. It seems on practice to be ineffective
       
      • Funny Funny x 1
    4. Lecic

      Lecic Convicted Lancake Abuser

      Joined:
      Apr 14, 2013
      Messages:
      5,101
      To my knowledge, you've clearly never tested EMP.
       
      • Agree Agree x 3
    5. Equalest

      Joined:
      May 16, 2017
      Messages:
      1
      Decay Config Option for Generated structures, aka changing the Tag to automatically be false or true
      Sorry, i dislike the new system for it and find it a poor idea for balance, please forgive me.
      Just doesn't really make sense, the point of scrapping is to reuse parts, breaking the part to use it doesn't really happen.
       
    6. Mortiferum

      Joined:
      Sep 4, 2013
      Messages:
      1,328
      Then you arent too knowledgeable, are you?
       
      #146 Mortiferum, May 18, 2017
      Last edited: May 18, 2017
      • Like Like x 1
    7. diremage

      diremage Tech Wizard

      Joined:
      Oct 26, 2016
      Messages:
      95
      Let damage pulse primary ignore shields -- swords can be a viable tactic, especially with small cloaking ships. Damage pulse/beam should be 3km, shield-piercing beam with a duty cycle of 1/10; damage pulse/missile should be a dumbfire, shield-piercing missile, and damage/pulse cannon should be a medium-range, moderate damage cannon with a long duty cycle. Pulse bare and pulse/pulse should retain the current effect, but ignore shields.

      Pulse/cannon should rightly be feared by modern titans as they can potentially one-shot delicate internal systems even in the presence of massive amounts of shields; this will spur the addition of armor to the current build meta and decrease the reliance on shields; however, weapons that do damage shields should keep a range and damage advantage that keep them relevant, while shield-piercing effects should be relegated to near-range and close-quarters combat.

      This will also enable a combat role for bombers and fighters as they can now be a threat to any ship if they get close enough.

      Damage beam / Missile and Cannon / Missile should have lock-on effects (cannon should lead the target but not maneuver in flight) at a cost of 25% reduction in damage.
       
      • Funny Funny x 1
    8. DrTarDIS

      DrTarDIS Eldrich Timelord

      Joined:
      Jan 16, 2014
      Messages:
      1,012
      would be fun
      would make fleet of cloaking drones scary-op without automated sensors though.


      this i like. outright.
       
      • Agree Agree x 3
    9. Mortiferum

      Joined:
      Sep 4, 2013
      Messages:
      1,328
      No

      I will simply make cannon/pulse with "shield bypass", put it onto a logic computer so I can use 200 outputs and blast the front of your ship off in a single volley.

      I will calculate it so that it would exactly be one shot to destroy 1 advance armor block as well to minimize power usage and nullify all protection given by armor. It enables nothing except absolute lunacy.
       
      • Agree Agree x 3
      • Useful Useful x 1
    10. Matt_Bradock

      Matt_Bradock The Shrink

      Joined:
      Aug 4, 2013
      Messages:
      798
      [​IMG]

      General rule of a sandbox game with PvP elements, based on my experience in Starmade, Empyrion, Rust, Reign of Kings and ARK: Whatever can be abused and exploited to make completely broken overpowered contraptions, WILL ALWAYS BE abused and exploited to make completely broken overpowered contraptions. The idea isn't bad as long as it's used as intended for a normal average player. But it will also be used by min-maxing players who passionately try to break every possible system in the game. That's who you need to balance the systems in Starmade for, minimizing the possible abuses and loopholes allowing broken, busted designs.
       
      • Agree Agree x 3
      • Funny Funny x 1
    11. Malacodor

      Joined:
      Mar 2, 2014
      Messages:
      1,293
      Everything that can be abused and exploited to gain any kind of advantage in any situation, be it in a video game or in the real world, will always be abused and exploited.
       
      • Agree Agree x 1
    12. diremage

      diremage Tech Wizard

      Joined:
      Oct 26, 2016
      Messages:
      95
      The idea is, if you can get close enough to do this, you deserve it. If the other guy can stay at range and pummel you with traditional weapons, your "uber gun" is going to be absolutely worthless. And if the other guy also has a shield breaker, he probably also has enough advanced armor to take a few hits.

      If you have to rely on Trump to make your argument, you probably don't have a very good argument. And you haven't actually come up with an abuse or a loophole.

      Again, saying "It could be abused" is very different from saying "It can be abused by doing x, y and z."
       
    13. Matt_Bradock

      Matt_Bradock The Shrink

      Joined:
      Aug 4, 2013
      Messages:
      798
      1. I'm European. I look at the entire last US elections and Trump's presidency as a (terrible) joke. So if I can use a Trump meme (he really makes it easy to make those) I might as well do so. Especially if it fits the current situation. I don't need Trump to support my argument, but I find it hilarious. (Hillaryous, even)

      2. I indeed haven't come up with a loophole. Anyone really into that, will, tho. Trident, Aegis, Vaygr, anyone already known for bringing the theoretically possible maximum of any viable weapon system. MortiferumMortiferum just mentioned he already has ideas how to abuse the living crap out of any weapon that bypasses shields. Hell, warhead cloakers were already abused a couple times, because warheads bypass shields. Imagine the nerdgasms all the griefers will get when they have a shield-bypass weapon that doesn't actually blow itself up when fired.
       
      • Agree Agree x 1
    14. Lecic

      Lecic Convicted Lancake Abuser

      Joined:
      Apr 14, 2013
      Messages:
      5,101
      Besides the fact that shield piercing weapons like this are a terrible idea for balance that will make shields entirely worthless, do you not understand how the master/slave system even WORKS? Primary is always the projectile type, and secondary is a modifier on that projectile. You have the secondary determining projectile type. Why? That's the opposite of how the system is supposed to be working.

      But sure, shield pierce. Great idea. I can't wait to build cloakers that gut entire ships of any size in a single shot.
       
      • Funny Funny x 1
    15. diremage

      diremage Tech Wizard

      Joined:
      Oct 26, 2016
      Messages:
      95
      Pulse is, barring some rare and exotic niche uses, entirely useless. Against a shielded object, pulse is worse than useless because it's taking up space, mass, and energy that could be used for a useful weapon.

      If that was something people could do, they would already be doing it with warheads.
       
      • Funny Funny x 1
    16. Lord_Greyscale

      Joined:
      Jun 24, 2015
      Messages:
      386
      On all of the servers where Warheads are modified to be "not shit-tier", they do exactly this to butt-fuck anything they don't like.

      hell, I've done it, and I've even done it on a few servers where warheads aren't modified. It just takes longer, and/or a specialized poker.
       
      • Agree Agree x 2
    17. boomchacle

      Joined:
      Aug 9, 2016
      Messages:
      21
      I feel like warheads should be very expensive and very powerful, instead of being super cheap and easy, but pointless

      it would add a new way for a small ship to take out larger ships, and it would also make larger ships have to focus on anti missile point defense.

      however, missile point defense would have to be more powerful, and I feel like using missile+cannon could be useful if they had a bit of flak detonation on them.
       
      • Like Like x 2
      • Agree Agree x 2
    18. Dire Venom

      Joined:
      Feb 27, 2014
      Messages:
      1,075
      I would personally go with Cannon-Missile as that variant isn't used and is awaiting a rework :3
       
      • Agree Agree x 1
    19. Captain Skwidz

      Captain Skwidz turtleStew

      Joined:
      Jun 14, 2017
      Messages:
      264
      I wish the mine layer weapon wasn't cancelled. Those artillery guns shown in the old weapons chart seemed pretty cool.
       
      • Agree Agree x 1
    20. YamiHikari

      Joined:
      Dec 10, 2017
      Messages:
      205
      Complex/manufactured blocks are worth more than the total worth of the materials required to create them. It would a) reignite a reliance on manufacturing instead of immediately selling raw resources, b) prevent the player from immediately obtaining all necessary resources for massive ships super early in the game, and c) draw attention to the manufacturing mechanics, leading to more suggestions for reworking any flaws or issues in them.
       
    Loading...