Search results

I love it.

Not my vote, not my problem. People wanted him, they got him, and we can deal with it.

I don't really care either. It's a good thing that MF gets representation - at least we have one big server owner in office. STV doesn't protect against minority voters getting representation, which in my mind is a good thing, even if the popular vote says no. Personal approval has nothing to...

How about server-owner campaigning? Or asking your friends to vote for you? Or talking to chat about the voting system and who you think will get in? You see, doing that will ensure that more people are angered. It's really, really easy to screw something up by trying to fix a non-issue that's...

It's a case of a vocal minority.

STV is still, combined, a better choice than most of the other systems we could have used. The other option is giving players multiple votes and working from there, and that's still problematic because it screws minority opinion groups. Right now, all of the complaints are stemming from the...

The economy favors using smaller ships that your mining can support easily. It's functional, but it could use a lot of work to make it truly useful on the scales people build at nowadays. I agree that larger ships need to be possible to take down with smaller ones (and they are, just not by...

The people who won were also the ones who advertised the most to their friends and followers.

Well, naturally it'll always be a factor. Boundaries exist to be pushed. But in the current state of the game, casual gameplay suffers dramatically because of the economy and combat meta, and servers choke on large objects doing big things. Do people need to stop using big ships? Hell no - it's...

Will do that next week, assuming I remember to. Thanks for the idea. :)

Listening to the conversation right now - a lot of things like "unplayable" and "lag" are getting thrown around. This isn't really so much of an issue with the game itself at the moment as it is an issue with the current combat meta (bigger is better). People are so afraid of losing materials...

Really fun fight, guys, even if I did get curb stomped by a missile done. There's something really, really fun about managing to nail people with cannon bursts at those speeds while trying to outmaneuver missiles, yeah? If you didn't get a good look at the nametag when you were scanning, I was...

I'm saying that we *need* non-binary outputs.

Arithmetic gates because of non-binary outputs.

You set up a shop, you set up all of the prices, you set what it can and cannot buy. You blueprint the station. You spawn the same model station somewhere else. You have to re-set the shop. Why not just add the module settings to the blueprint itself? I mean, we already save Bobby AI settings...

In most of my ships, one large-ish missile crater or being cheesed by a punchthrough burst cuts down enough of its efficiency that I have to salvage and replace with under 5% mass loss, or I risk getting mangled by enemy faction ships.

If you have a ship where it's worth respawning it the hard way, you have at least 30 minutes of hard turret cleanup work in addition to just salvaging it.

In X3, you were able to link stations together for factory loops, thus turning them into larger individual stations.

Welcome to the team, guys. Hope you enjoy your stay :D bspkrs has been known about for several days, but micdoodle8 is news. This is better than I'd hoped for - not just one new coder, but two? :D

StarSide: Blood and Steel day 2 semifinal match. Thryn Monarchy vs. Drakkart. Glory to Thryn! Victorious is he who spams drones!