Search results

    1. Tsnonak

      The Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade.

      Simple just stop "forcing" me to shitpost here... this thread is for "feedback", thank you.
    2. Tsnonak

      The Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade.

      Yes, now we are really going places... This magnificent compilation of "blockage" is the end result of unbalanced weapons, armor, and shields "forcing" elite PvPers to "meta exploit". I heard the stories... The cascade of a couple / few thousands light rods in front of the hull is missing...
    3. Tsnonak

      The Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade.

      I am not even talking about the proposed reactor / stab size currently, did you not notice? (rhetorical, surely you did, but it's a good distraction*). Yes the clique; just can't let it go, the enemy must be destroyed, must have last word... that is very clear. The aggressiveness displayed here...
    4. Tsnonak

      The Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade.

      It seems I have not been clear enough... I have read enough of your obnoxious PvP-Elitist reasoning and petty attempts to pass this off as "creative friendliness". You just don't seem to understand reality, your point of view is only one part of the whole. Distraction, evasion and...
    5. Tsnonak

      CS: Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade

      You seem to have overlooked the part before the comma?
    6. Tsnonak

      The Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade.

      Thank you for the lengthy explanation, but it does not change the fact: I was extremely disappointed not even 1 single example ship was available for inspection / testing. To clear up the "context", and avoid any further confusion, because well, all this is very confusing... MrGrey1 is not...
    7. Tsnonak

      CS: Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade

      good ol' Nauv, adding his shitty 0.02€ = priceless
    8. Tsnonak

      The Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade.

      SchnellBier I don't dig TLDRs either, so I'll keep it short, I'll save the quoting and just answer direct... Thank you Schnellbier, you answered the question very clearly. Sadly the rest of your post is nothing more than manipulative hearsay, (du redest gerade wie du es brauchst, kennste ja...
    9. Tsnonak

      The Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade.

      Apologies, but I just have to expand on this for a moment... "fast and unbureaucratic" is this really a good idea? ... Inviting the community to partake in this "Initiative" is an invitation to bureaucratic debating. Isn't this contradictive? It is feeling like... sure, share your concerns...
    10. Tsnonak

      CS: Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade

      Although i find it very nice of you to speak for the whole community, but I would have to say MrGrey1 has a good point which goes beyond just ship classification.
    11. Tsnonak

      The Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade.

      That, is an interesting statement. ^^ No comment on the stabilizer thing? Am I being too bureaucratic? Another thought... back to the Global / Individual Block [effects], EM, Therm, Kinetic... defense consists of: Global depending on type hit (armor, basic...
    12. Tsnonak

      The Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade.

      Thank you, i was so amazed by the long recharge (took about an afkotherstuff hour)I totally did not even think about that, you got me... Now that is what i call balance, only off by 8 and i would have broke even! :LOL: oh man... Edit: Googledoc: "Shield and armor defenses (aside from certain...
    13. Tsnonak

      The Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade.

      So ok, nobody seems to care about breaking everything built since power 2.0 / weapons 3.0, or the huge reactor / stabilizer blob that "sort of belongs in the center of the ship" somewhere, idk... Maybe this will get some attention... The shield recharge on the sever is broke or something and /...
    14. Tsnonak

      The Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade.

      Yes, a much needed change, We use 0.8 <!-- 1 is equal to 100% sector radius --> on LK custom config. A simple non invasive balance problem fixed... Now if it only worked on player ships... Unfortunately Quickfire cannot make that happen. Also, some will love this... pvp camping "Eve-Voxel...
    15. Tsnonak

      The Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade.

      History seems to always repeat itself, natural phenomena, the whole world just going in circles, business as usual, it is. **Answer: Listening to the same people and expecting a different outcome? :LOL: ... "you cannot solve a problem with the same thinking that created it." ~ E ~
    16. Tsnonak

      The Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade.

      Currently neither Armor nor the "RHP" thing are the "center" of concern. It would be nice to stay on topic... and save the mass / armor / shield / thrust stuff for another time. Both MrGrey1 and I have other concerns regarding reactors / stabilzation... not even 100% identical concerns for...
    17. Tsnonak

      The Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade.

      This is exactly what I was referring to in my previous post, why bother suggesting anything. It is disgarded, distracted from, and replaced with the correct opinion: a month or 2 ago.. l o l Edit: the actual date was 24 days ago, not hard to find... not even a month.
    18. Tsnonak

      The Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade.

      Thank you, I am aware of the location, I pulled it July 05. Who is forcing them... nobody.
    19. Tsnonak

      The Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade.

      Noted, thank you. Well there would be a couple things here 1. + individual block defence (set in BlockConfig.xml per block) 2. Last time I pulled Quickfire config there were vanilla settings, not this: Clearly that is one step in the right direction, (global modifier). I was referring...
    20. Tsnonak

      The Quickfire Initiative: Rebalancing StarMade.

      long pause... ... so make it even heavier? I may be a little confused, but this is sounding very presumptous, situational, and subjective to me. Bottom line in my opinion is: this does not justify breaking everything all over again. Lets take this one step at a time please, I'm slow like...