Search results

Yes. I'd like the mechanic of accessing/using the core to change. Instead of actually entering the core, your player just aligns to it, so your character is vulnerable, you'll have to build your ship to protect yourself from shots. Same thing with weapon computers.

I dunno man, small ships would have even less of a purpose in big fights without turrets to pick off.

Any word if this one has been squashed in v.158? edit: sorry for semi-offtopic . . . Good writeup about your issues, gravypod. Running a starmade server can be pretty rough. I kinda see both sides to it. People are over-eager to rush to the defense of schema and X dev(s), although trying to run...

Most players losses are likely from people who don't have the patience to sit through alpha/beta changes. I've definitely had some periods where I get burned out from it. Retrofitting ships can be a chore, I can see why people with really large fleets lose their will to continue with constant...

Yeah, just make the docking beam do it.

I don't know if the boxing analogy really applies here. Although a lightweight has a very slim chance, he will at least do some noticeable damage, maybe even score a hit to the chin for a KO. Currently in Starmade, smaller vs larger ships is more like an unprotected fist slamming into a brick...

Let's just find a nice S-Curve value to put shields and thrusters on. You guys can go on and on about this all you want, but gigantism will always win out if growth is linear.

Do you have a recent backup? I haven't seen this one. What happens if you enter your universe under a different name?

Well, the inventory already has a search field. I'd like to see the inventory interface expanded (for those of us with post-2003 resolution capable monitors) when you're in a plexchest, so you don't have to scroll.

Are shotgun beams dead now, or just a bug? Also, will we be able to use the effects of effects computers as a standalone buff when they are also slaved to a primary weapons system?

I can't see anything from those, they are tiny screenshots. Kinda wanted to see the server IP you're entering. Looks like you're failing authentication from starmade.org?

Have you tried turning it off and on again? . . . . . . . Also, post a screenshot of your connection screen (where it displays your name, settings, and server IP, and whatnot).

Sweet! At first glance overdrive seems kinda OP with beams, since beams don't require energy to fire. The top speed boost is pretty crazy. Also, Ion effect is still broken. TIME FOR MORE TINKERING.

Just a passing thought, but maybe with the upcoming faction point system there can be an upkeep system. The idea is that the mass of all your factioned ships is combined and requires X amount of faction points to be able to field. Naturally, as a server option only and not mandatory.

I'll add, I was observing the behavior of one of my AI fighters today. The main armament consists of a beam and 4 d1000 arrays. it has two turrets, each with an AMC array. The ship would only fire 1 of it's 7 possible weapon arrays at a time. If the left turret was shooting, that's all that...

Indeed. Smoothness is the biggest issue for me currently. Running v.153, sector and skybox transitions have become extremely abrupt and rough. I'll fly through a sector, then the enemy ship(s) around me will be in a completely different area, appearing to teleport around. Also, projectiles in a...

Nice videos. Is turning on beams with the logic system broken in v.152? Side note: it would be swell if we could use control + v to bind arrays (like plexdoors) to activation modules instead of doing each block individually.

Yeah, thats what i ended up doing.

I'll add that my D1000-D1000/EXP AI turret doesn't track or fire at enemy targets either. Put a beam comp + beam module on it, still won't track and fire. AMC-AMC/EXP AI turret works just fine. .152