Search results

I would love to see the PLEX Saw. I presume that it would only work if things were connected by a single block, and not just slice any entity in half?

There would be no reason at all to defend a planet or station if this was implemented.

Yeah, this is something I would like to see. What I'm arguing against is the CONSTRUCTION of suits and such from blocks.

There is no fuel. Why should the player be able to make themselves into a fighter with their jetpack, armor, and handheld weapon? I don't think we should be able to build armor or jetpacks out of voxels, that's what custom skins are for. Guns, however, should be able to be built with tiny...

Probably used the sound from the movie, and due to lame copyright laws, it was taken down.

What do you mean when you say it doesn't make you fully invisible?

Use the master:slave system to your advantage. If the default cannon speed is too slow for you, slave some cannons to it to get the rapid cannons.

Am I the only one who actually likes the linear dampening as is?

The large also has a much larger surface area to mount turrets to, so they spit out much more firepower. In a battle between large ships, dodging is something that will happen very rarely. They're just too big to miss at combat ranges.

You have to use power supply beams from the docked reactors now, instead of power drain beams from the main ship. I think there might be some other step, but I don't remember. I've never used docked reactors because I feel like they are cheaty.

Twice the power of the old system, or twice the power when in a master:slave system? Because if it's the second one, it shouldn't be doing that. You get 1 damage : 10 E (except with beams which are probably bugged), regardless of how the system is set up.

Extra Credits did an excellent video on early access games. If you put something on Steam too early, it loses it's hype and players who played during early alpha (like now) get bored and don't come back when it's finished. They tell their friends, "eh, it was ok," and those friends don't buy it.

This would make the overpoweredness of docked generators even easier to exploit. No support.

When 90% of defensive combat revolves around shields, I'd say the recharge rates are an important, core feature.

Wrong. You do not need to double the weapons size to be effective. Cut your old systems in half, and replace them with slave modules. The DPS will remain the same as if you left it as a single, unslaved weapon system.

Well then it's a good thing there is one developer coding and one making the vanilla statistics, instead of 1 doing both. Shield recharge rate is a core part of the game, anyway.

I don't think we're getting high speed in universe travel. It lags heavily, especially on smaller sector sizes. I'm pretty sure we're getting some kind of teleportation type FTL.

You can always space walk to an asteroid, hand mine it, sell the rock and ore, and get a core + ship bits and start all over again. Anyway, ever hear about putting all your eggs in one basket? Have multiple ships in case something like this happens.

Ships have HP based on the blocks they have, hull gives a lot more HP than system blocks. Blocks will presumably still be damageable once shield drops, otherwise a large number of weapons and systems would be kind of useless. If a dev like schema or Calbiri could fill us in on how exactly the...

You can either have a much wider range of targeting with a turret, or use a tractor beam on the main ship with less maneuverability. Or get someone else to pilot your tractor beam turret. It'd be extremely over powered to have it like the op has suggested.