Search results

This would make for a VERY good capital ship system, unlike Hyperdrive which should really just become the normal mode of FTL (Jump Drive should remain for specialized purposes, though) and not be a capital ship system. Also, the portal should be in the capital ship's control, so once the fleet...

Yeah; I was saying that perhaps it should be a little more than the same...

So, Alcubierre drive? Lol.

Perhaps unrefined ores should be 0.015 volume, so there's some incentive to get the stuff refined as fast as possible. As I'd said in Slack, what's being mined isn't pure mineral and crystal... For instance, if you mine Sertise, it's probably mostly Larimar and "Sertisite" rocks which have to be...

Thrust update is scheduled for tomorrow. While there may be a delay (I personally think it's coming out this weekend) that'll be for fixing bugs, not adding in another new feature that wasn't planned.

One of my ships has "ghost computers" in its bridge as well, still linked to the ship core despite not really existing... Grrr!

The system has not changed since the logic release.

I was picturing the range going up with size, with diminishing returns; the actual cone angle would stay the same. The main thing that would scale would be the salvaging rate.

The game uses some kind of partial duplicate entity in the other sector to handle collisions and visibility and stuff; it doesn't have full capabilities of a loaded entity in your sector and there are some other issues with things that go across sector borders. My advice: Just stay away from them.

We could always do this too... But yeah, not a bad idea.

YES. This is good. Currently wormholes are just an awkward galactic tube system... No secret wormhole routes, no sense of discovery, etc. Lots of good, but needs its own topic.

Oh, for some reason it looked to me like only one side had a wing. Never mind!

...Ew, the Trading Guild is using a heavily asymmetric shuttle? Not sure if I like it...

Just shutting it off on sector borders as a precaution would be preferable to not implementing it at all.

Remember that you can put activator next to a rail docker and it will turn on when docked. Just have it turn off the pulling from the drill. However, yes, simultaneous cross-entity pulls should be implemented; I don't quite get why the game doesn't already allow for it.

Loading a whole second copy of the ship would mean tons of lag when someone first hits you with an astrotech beam. Compared to that, just storing the second copy constantly sounds like a better idea. ...At which point you need a huge repair ship, and if power requirements were, say...

Fnaffing sounds like a really bad idea... whatever you mean by that... so uh yeah I agree and stuff

Aaaand there's the problem. That means each ship takes up 2x as much data, which is no problem at all in Robocraft with their tiny 'bots, but in Starmade it can swiftly become a big deal as you go up the ship scale.

There are technical reasons why this can't really work, for the time being. It may be changed later, but for now... nope.

Never suggest something to circumvent mechanics that are bugged... Unless the bug is a long-standing technical dilemma or something. This is just a plain-old bug, when in doubt assume it will be fixed.