Search results

What is your reasoning behind this statement?

Interesting design. You're turrets are similar to some of my designs as well. For details, try some "windows" using lights and/or crystals. It makes any build look more ship-like and less like a random polygonal shape. If you are concerned about armor weaknesses, place a layer of...

Hey ZektorSK, My challenge still stands. Build an 8,000 mass brick. Put anything you want in it then come fight me one on one. I'll bring My pathfinder. - If you focus on damage output, I'll shred you like tin foil for neglecting your defenses. - If you use an Ion beam, my armor...

You try again until you learn. If that doesn't work, you get help. If that doesn't work, you can either be a stubborn, determined little Temmie and keep trying until you get the hang of it or you exercise your right to cognitive dissonance and claim that if something you want is beyond your...

You've undoubtedly opened a can of worms that will continue while you're away. Have fun on your vacation and take care. Most of this is correct. The only flaw I see is the fact that virtually all PVP torpedoes require the use of the speed/clipping exploit to be effective. This capability...

There is a lot of fun to be had with warheads and I've been researching them as well as launch methods for them for several years. Unfortunately, they are grossly under-powered. Having to rely on the speed/clipping effect causes a level of unreliability that can cost you a battle. Not to...

Nah, that's just a fancy launch system. When they buff warhead damage, I'm going to make a launcher that fires these guided MIRV weapons. Right now, it's hard to justify the required resources on something that will be destroyed.

Nah, not really. 1) I'm not dissing. I quite proud of what I've created. Everyone who's seen it agrees that the game simply isn't ready for something that complex. So the only thing I can do is laugh about it. Have a sense of humor. ;) 2) The 'correct' method you refer to relies on part...

Actually no. 1) That MK137 is not 'better', it's just bigger. You and I are using the same method, just on a different scale. I too experimented with larger torpedoes once. I lost interest when I realized I was essentially ramming a ship with another ship and that torpedo damage does not...

Making the 'best' torpedoes since 2016? o_O I think you and I need to have a little chat...

I'll have you know; I was pretty damn good at building with Legos when I was 6 years old. :p ...So good that I continued to play with them well into my adulthood.

OMG! This! So much, THIS!!! EDIT: ZektorSK, please understand that no one here is being malicious. We are merely pointing out that; 1) You can have both. 2) There are those among us who are willing to help you get both. What you do with this knowledge is up to you.

You misunderstand; both our intentions and your own posting habits. Nearly every post you've made on this thread seems to argue against the use of aesthetics, almost as if to say, "well, if I can't figure it out, then it's not worth doing". You also have a history of complaining that your...

...and you have gotten your answer. Yet (according to your posts) you don't seem to agree with it. What what exactly do you want from us?

I second this. @ ZektorSK I've repeatedly offered to help you and I've even shown you a few things. Right now you're coming off as feeling sorry for yourself about your lack of creativity. Stop projecting your insecurity about your supposed lack of aesthetics on to other people. Learn...

o_O I beg to differ. Tell you what; I challenge you to bring your best 8,000 mass ship and fight me in one of my pathfinders. I'll leave the fighters at home. I can guarantee you; you're gonna have a bad time...

Awwwww snap! Species 8472 multi-ship Death Star beam for the win! ...and yes; The Whammy likes pretty.

Kinda gives a whole new meaning to the line: "Come on! Step on it! I can get out and run faster than this!"

Sorry Lidren, I appreciate the suggestion but your server is too restrictive for what I'm trying to do. I will not be held to a 3-person rule. This is the ultimate deal breaker for me. I am very productive for a single player faction; sometimes rivaling some multi-player factions. In one...

This is stupid. Multi-player is very rapidly losing its appeal for me. It seems like everyone is biased against one-man factions so you are denied access to many servers if you don't grab a bunch of other players and play the stupid space politics game. Mining bonuses on most servers are...