Make small arms penetrate shields

    Snk

    Joined
    Aug 30, 2013
    Messages
    1,186
    Reaction score
    155
    • Legacy Citizen
    • Top Forum Contributor
    It'd be easier to use a ship. No one is going to take 3 days before they do that, I don't care if they're a fedora wearing neck beard living in their moms basement. They'd die of thirst, or you'd log on. Besides, we could make hulls invincible.
     
    Joined
    Oct 11, 2013
    Messages
    797
    Reaction score
    441
    • Competition Winner - Stations
    • Master Builder Bronze
    • Thinking Positive
    It'd be easier to use a ship. No one is going to take 3 days before they do that, I don't care if they're a fedora wearing neck beard living in their moms basement. They'd die of thirst, or you'd log on. Besides, we could make hulls invincible.
    Then people would exploit by spamming hulls in their hallways and removing them when they get out.
     

    Snk

    Joined
    Aug 30, 2013
    Messages
    1,186
    Reaction score
    155
    • Legacy Citizen
    • Top Forum Contributor
    Then people would exploit by spamming hulls in their hallways and removing them when they get out.
    Eh. These arguments are circular. There are a million ways to grief and defend your ship. Honestly, no one is going to eat a ship with a pistol. He'll, if someone is willing to put days into it, they deserve the ship.
     

    Mariux

    Kittenator
    Joined
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages
    1,822
    Reaction score
    658
    • Purchased!
    • Community Content - Silver 1
    • Legacy Citizen 8
    Am I the only one around here getting real tired of those threads sayin' that this and that should ignore shields blah blah blah... Seriously. That's what shields are for in the first place. To protect ships in combat from other ships AND prevent random noobs from randomly damaging your ship (and possibly destroying it with all it's cargo). And for boarding... it would only encourage teamwork if there were no weapons that would ignore shields, for example, one player would keep target ship's shields down while the other one will do the boarding. Because boarding is SUPPOSED to be hard. You get a darned ship if you succeed!
     
    • Like
    Reactions: NeonSturm

    Snk

    Joined
    Aug 30, 2013
    Messages
    1,186
    Reaction score
    155
    • Legacy Citizen
    • Top Forum Contributor
    Boarding isn't hard, it's impossible and pointless. You can't take down anything with a pistol. They're useless.
     

    Mariux

    Kittenator
    Joined
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages
    1,822
    Reaction score
    658
    • Purchased!
    • Community Content - Silver 1
    • Legacy Citizen 8
    Boarding isn't hard, it's impossible and pointless. You can't take down anything with a pistol. They're useless.
    Then why make it damage hull in the first place?
     
    Joined
    Jun 19, 2014
    Messages
    1,756
    Reaction score
    162
    • Purchased!
    • Top Forum Contributor
    • Legacy Citizen
    To all of you who like shields taking all the damage: why would you want that? Especially when it comes to collision damage, that should not let shields take the damage.
     

    NeonSturm

    StormMaker
    Joined
    Dec 31, 2013
    Messages
    5,110
    Reaction score
    617
    • Wired for Logic
    • Thinking Positive
    • Legacy Citizen 5
    I want things to penetrate shields if:
    You pay for ammo
    dis-integrators, though they could do reduced damage to shielded targets
    ramming other ships​
    If shields get below 10 or 25% and the weapon relies on constantly dropped shields (hand-gun, power drain) to make damage (with support) more reliable.​