Search results

... ... ... walks over to pile of forgotten ships Blows dust off U.S.S. Asimov I'm Back Baby.

I still need to finish some stuff that might not move like my Nacelles... but other than that everything, including the rooms, is up in the air until power and systems are more stable.

So here's my Quarterly stupid question that ties directly to my obsession with building Star Trek. So if I understand the new power system, you can dock a reactor. But only one reactor can be active across the entire entity chain. So in theory I could build my full RP Star Trek ship with a...

This is all amazing. Because of you madmen we shall have fully functional turbolifts.

Yes... always.

DukeofRealms Any chance that we can know if planets are going to be around the same size? Or are they going to get bigger? I only ask cause I'm working on two planet based projects and I'd like to know if I should pause them.

alterintel It's glorious...

Same here, I need my Capital City with Spaceport.

I know some people are going to hate this, I know I'll get flamed or yelled at, but I have to admit that I like this. I like this even knowing that it might destroy my ships I've designed, or destroy my ability to build my style. Because lets be honest, if Starmade is going to grow and standout...

I look at shipyards on ships as a thing that should happen, but with a couple limits that would keep them from becoming op. (1) Limit the max size of construction. I think that things like mines, torps, and drones is a must, but maybe allow up to small fighters/shuttles. No "My 3km mothership...

I'm not usually the glass half empty type of guy, but the more I see and hear I wonder why the devs even started talking about a possible power change so early. For the most part all it's done is cause drama in the community and a large amount of builders to flat out stop building.

Update: Finally had tooth pulled Thrusday. Still recovering. Working on Station slowly.

Only reason I'm suggestion a docker is so that the RDP can (1) drain energy from the docked entity and (2) disable reactors that are docked to the entity chain so as to avoid any exploiting of the system.

New Block Type: Reactor Docking Port, or any name that's better. Limit: 1 per ship. The primary difference between this dock and any other is that this block pulls energy from a entity chain instead of supplying it. I would suggest that additional RDPs (Reactor Docking Ports) attached to an...

May I suggest to combat the over use of docked reactors that the "reactor dock" be limited to one(1) per ships similar to a core and set to drain power from what ever is docked instead of supplying it? So that the reactor can use a regular docking modular. This allows you to build a large...

Primary Edit: I like this idea quite a bit, not really much to say pro or con since I have no ideas on power generation or how to make it better. Still reading but I have this to say. But I will admit I like any power idea that is the follow, and will update this or another post when I finish...

Well if they did that'd be cool, but Any reactor would be fine. Even if we can't eject part of it I might still remake my eject able warp core to use again.

Well they have Fusion reactors for back up and auxiliary power. The warp core generates most power for the ship under normal operations since it's just a matter/antimatter engine for the most part.

Kirk... I love ya, We also need reactor breaches... cause WARP CORE BREACH!!!

See this is what I like to see, Ideas instead of freaking out.