Search results

That leads to rampant griefing problems.

Nope. They don't ignore shields at all.

Mining one station takes far longer than mining five to ten asteroids and provides a similar amount of resources, Visitor. There is seriously no reason for players to touch them after they have a non-decayed base.

I'm not such a big fan of random chance in a building/engineering game, myself, but your idea is sound. Let's not do the exploding block thing, though. That's pretty much just a pointless frustration device.

I'm pretty sure that we're already moving away from even using cores in the first place in the future. At least, that's how it feels, with the Center of Mass stuff I keep hearing about being in the dev build.

Right now we have Decayed stations all over the place, yeah? You can get one Scrap Alloy or Circuit (or whatever the name is) per each block harvested when salvaging a station. It takes a number of these to create one Alloy Mesh or one Crystal Composite. You seriously get more Mesh/Composite...

Added a third concept. This might turn into a suggestion compilation on docking and relative motion, fair warning.

That's how I test turrets, usually. Walking around the bridge, sipping an overly sweet cappuccino and chatting up that attractive new communications officer that just transferred in from the Trading Guild, while the rest of the ship happily blasts hundreds of Isanths out of the sky - what a life.

Ah, good catch. Perhaps restrict inverse docking to Ship and Asteroid entities.

Rail Dock Collector We have rail dockers for docking from inside the docked object already. We would do well to have the inverse too. My idea - the Rail Dock Collector. It's a simple block that functions identically to a Rail (ie: it moves blocks in the direction of the arrow if other rails...

How about instead of just raising the max speed, we allow the Rail Speed Controller to also increase speed (and thus increase mass enhancer requirements for that object)? ...also, inherit undock velocity please.

This would be a great balance against the currently OP-as-fuck missiles we have. It would also make hand-built torpedoes worth using. I fully support this. I also support the idea of other weapons being able to use ammo as a shot modifier - say, warheads for explosive radius boosts, different...

I can get behind this, though I feel that crew would do well if we added mid-combat debuffs (like reduced power generation, thrusters disabled, shield recharge stopped, etc.) that crew could protect against and repair, along with allowing crew to man turrets for considerably better effectiveness...

I'll admit that it could do with a little bit more detailing on the landing pad (maybe detail squares made with mesh wedges and hazard stripes or something), but the pad is the only part I dislike. nevermind our temporary base being just a flat panel of crystal composite and some systems Fancy...

What doomcubes? Please, point to a single ship built and flown by Thryn that was a doomcube.

Announcements: Thryn is now officially on Shattered Skies. ignore our homebase. it's temporary, we swear. Thryn's current asteroid mining vessel, the Virage, is mostly functional. will post screenshots when finished The Superiordinator, a coordination between Refirendum and I to totally...

I keep telling myself that Starmade won't be totally free after it hits beta. I dunno when that'll happen. Too many bugs to be the final release, and we need some sort of real enjoyability for solo players other than building pretty ships and st00f.

This is what happens when people let Ref and I go on a rampage in an old ship for a few days. :P

We'd need multiple inputs and outputs for this, rather than just the rudimentary single connection system we have right now.

Kinda hard to keep it friendly when people keep lying to protect their god-emperor from having any sort of accountability for his actions.