Search results

at least with now shadows and an undo function. the \"better fast placing\" is ok, nothing wrong, but it seems less important.

just watch episode one of next generation. don\'t know if it could in the original.

and just so people understand, this is NOT to replace the current controls, but to add another option

this idea has been discussed there, and shows the pros and cons

generally they would be salvaged on servers, in particular by new players. and I agree that they should be a config option for those servers where money is provided and salvaging is a novelty.

I have seen people talking about super turrets killing people from several sectors away, so my guess is that this has been changed

why not set it to aim at target. though this can cause problems if you target for navigation purposes

that sounds... sadistic

this is based on the fact that new weapons are likely to be unique, like the power drain beam. any new weapons that do the same thing are redundant. yes, new additions may require tweaks to the system, this is alpha, but I doubt any will require AMCs to be overpowered. by the way, most people...

behaves like hull. it is actually stronger than regular hull. to make hull strong and plex-glass weak would lead to either people targeting cockpits to blind players, or cockpits being buried in hull, using graphics glitches to see. in other words, is plex-glass gets left behind, it will not be...

your first suggestion is already in the next version, as is cockpit orientation. and checking the forums is also a good idea, because had you done so, you would know that Shema has said that he will NOT be adding multi-directional gravity.

disclaimer first, this is not in any way intended to compete with McDili's thread. I made this suggestion on his thread and he said that because he wanted his thread to stay on the original idea, that I should make my own thread. there is no animosity between us over this. his idea was that...

but I will still reply to this last post :) I did think of making missiles ignore armor, but that would change the balance of missiles, something I didn\'t want to do (in hindsight missiles needed a boost anyway but oh well) as far as your idea being more consistent between servers, you seem...

why didn\'t I think of this before! a separate armor value that applies to AMCs! capping the damage would work for the current ships, but as I have said, it might just lead to shotgun ships. now, a cap is likely easier to implement, and if it is a choice between a cap and nothing, I would choose...

please read my thread \"why an ai will not be able to patrol multiple sectors\". this gives the main reason why patrol systems will not be added.

please fix

after all, disintegrates are one time use. even if you had lots of them on your ship, they cost resources to use, unlike the other weapons

this means that big guns are still viable, so shotgun ships are unnecessary. they are still more efficient, but not the only way to go

i believe he was referring to the amc checkerboard, hence his reference to cubes

battleships are designed to fire from incredibly long range, they were the artillery of the seas. this is why they were made obsolete by carriers, since planes can travel much farther than shells.