Search results

Check console logs after running the command: [ADMIN COMMAND] GIVEID from org.schema.schine.network.server.AdminLocalClient@7c223bea params: [ErthParadine, 80, -1] Further, running the command via StarNet returns a 0 errorstatus,. which is a standard way of saying that no errors occurred...

I'm still trying to figure out why you think you deserved any sort of acknowledgement or reply regarding an out-of-the-blue PM, over an issue you were not directly involved in, and which should not have affected your ability to access our server. In fact, this whole "insiders" posting of yours...

How about a documented API for the NPC interfaces? Lua programming?

Try reducing max segments to ~1/4 pre-block16 settings (schema might think about forcing the setting downwards for all).

Disabling respawn will reduce the frequency, but it'll still occur. We're seeing roids as large as ~500k w/ the setting at 1.

In a way, it appears so. Here's what it looks like to me, at least based upon some rough testing and calculations: Mining yields appear to calculated at the chunk level, and not block level. Since the number of chunks have been reduced by a factor of 8, mining yields have also been suitably...

Making a few modifications to my original (above) suggestion/request: Please be more consistent with console and existing file logging. A month of console output, rotated and compressed daily, consumes less than 600MB of disk space. Our DB+blueprints consumes ~61GB at the moment. Meaning that a...

Love this. Any chance of adding a BACKUP_WORLD_ON_UPGRADE option, for the same reasons. Or does the launcher not look at this file?

A test on our blueprint and world DBs (which are roughly twice the size of Schine's test DB) shows this takes about twice as long, so roughly speaking I'm seeing a linear relationship between conversion size and time. So happy with the reduction in disk space requirements too. A system of...

Servers can somewhat already do this, by adding info to the server-message.txt file, which is that popup everyone ignores/quickly-closes upon logging-in. Although it would be really nice if that same server-message.txt info was available in the "Server Details" portion of a launcher's "Online...

We have, and last time we talked about it you linked to a great start on an implementation option. Although a neural network twist didn't occur to me until recently.

Having just stumbled across NEATEvolve.lua, and finding hints of a Planned - LUA interface ...has anyone had success implementing something this complicated within SM's existing LUA engine? This article better describes NEATEvolve.lua: Watch this learning AI smash Super Mario World with ease

So a maximum jump distance that varies based upon a specific ship's max speed? I like that idea.

I was actually suggesting the development of a weekly trade activity "report" for our server earlier today, as a lot of the trade information is already logged, so its mostly a matter of capturing/recording, and aggregating this info.

In your current state: what settings are working for you? As for the topic of SM's main server-side bottlenecks? AABB checks are #1 in my book. Next would be blocking threads related to sector loads, blueprint, and faction turns (trade threads are much better behaved now). Various logic & rail...

Why not simply exclude the video files from your backups? As for duration of time, the video files add 10-15 seconds to our overall update time. That's not really a concern from where I'm sitting, especially when it takes 15+ minutes for the mandatory creation of a .zip file prior to update (a...

Alright, so that means I can't call you a pigeon anyone. Darn it! Seriously though, thanks for clarifying.

Well, the way I read your earlier message, you: I've had players seriously argue that whole-server lag should be tolerated in PVP, and your reply seemed to be an extension that argument. Maybe you meant to say that if a server chooses to bill itself as a "PvP server" or "PvP friendly server"...

Maybe this needs more testing on newer releases. In May just one ship, with a very large docked reactor, was able to repeatedly and consistently lagoff all players, as the ship's original pilot repeatedly relogged over a period of hours.

My only concern with docked reactors, is when they're shoehorned into a loosely-designed hull; if/when the reactors undock, their clipping causes whole-server lag. After all, how difficult is it, really, to decorate and attach externally. As for the possible imbalance *shrugs*, in my opinion...