Search results

The broom has spoken wisely...

"It's just a big-ass ship" that can do more than your average big-ass shootin' lootin' tootin' ship, such as manufacture ship. These Capital Components allow for a wider range of ships, ESPECIALLY in fleets. Are you suggesting either remove Capital turret mount from Supercarriers, or reduce...

While moderation is good and all, the mods here seem to be a tad bit too strict. This isn't saying I want them gone, as I'm glad that they got rid of Odium when they thought it'd be a good idea to dox their war opponents. And those who want no offensive content whatsoever are just whiny little...

The purpose of a MOTHERSHIP is to allow for nomadic lifestyle. The reason I changed Capitals so much, it was because the Capitals were pretty much Motherships, except they weren't homebased. That's why the moving base cannot have mega-guns. :p The problem, is that this still reinforces the...

I do agree, however, IIRC, stations are going to be receiving MASSIVE buffs, in order to improve everything in general, from defenses to utility, especially if one specializes a station into one specific utility. Because this is designed with the future economy updates in mind. I wrote (I...

SkylordLuke plz, I was hoping ye'd fix it. :p The Dynamic Galaxies thread isn't one for terrain/galaxy shit, it's for empires and factions and such. Hell, I never even mentioned void sectors, yet it be in that category.

But we're not talking about drones, we're talking about people playing video games. They're not going to be drones, there here to have fun, and if a complex reactor system put them off from having fun, then that's their own problem entirely. While min-maxing may not exactly be fun, there is no...

You have saved my ships, thus, you are donned the Hoopkins medal of honor. <3

Bump for more discussion, I would like to be able to actually build a mobile shipyard at some point. :p

I quite like the current reactor algorithms, it may be complicated/confusing at first, but that's just part of the learning curve, and experimentation. I also find it hard to believe that the complexity reactors made people not want to play, it's not as if you NEED the magical meta reactors...

SkylordLuke plz, you didn't even mention any of my suggestions. Not even the Dynamic Galaxies one! :p One a side note, to anyone reading this, could we start discussion back up for Capital Ships 'n' shit? It was getting somewhere, but then it just stopped suddenly... Oh you did, just under...

There are some valid points, and some that aren't, but everyone else has pretty much covered them. So instead, I'm going to provide you with a special bit of research I did with someone else a while back (Dammit, can't remember their name) to show that the community isn't a toxic cesspool. :p...

Fantastic as the last chapter. Looks like I don't need to stab ye today. ^_^

I swear to god, if you don't pump out more soon I'm going to stab you. It's fucking good. :p

Seriously, this is terrible. It can be useful and generally a good idea, but the justification justifies the above meme. Gigantism isn't something that calls for a hard cap to fix, (which will ultimately cause more problems than solve), rather, it calls for the economy to fix itself, which is...

Plz no, don't ruin my fun again. D:

So, they've got LAVA wedges planned, but reject BROWN lights? Oh hell no. kupu, YOU'VE CROSSED THE LINE! :p On a side note, I believe a proper liquid system will be added for lava and water, thus making them properly flow, and making nice rivers/pools of lava. For building, it'd be a bit hard...

Welp, shit. Hopefully it does get overhauled, I'd like my doors to not glow in the dark. \o/ MY BROWN LIGHTS MAY YET BE A THING!

I'd suggest making a separate suggestion, so that you can get more opinions on it 'n' shit. :p

Fucking hell kupu, you just get better and better. :p How exactly does the lighting work? I would expect it to be ray casting with some minimal reflections, which would make cross-entity lighting rather easy.