Search results

No; actually, then what would be accomplished is exactly what Warsong seems to want - "meaningful" responses only. However, I don't think that it'd be worth it. Going back to just Likes wouldn't be too bad, though. Having Like and Dislike, but with no stupid reputation/statistics system, would...

Wait, @DukeofRealms , you can set PERMISSIONS on ratings? That's actually fairly amusing to me for some reason. :P

...And laggy due to lack of optimization. Laggy in every sense. Slow FPS, slow loading... However, with optimization, yeah, they could be awesome. And: No. Personally, I only get lost because of disorientation from strange gravity mechanics (or, more accurately, bad player position handling)...

Silence on the internet carries nothing; it can just mean you forgot about the topic or overlooked the post. EDIT: Haha, see that Old rating? I told you guys that ratings would just cease to be accurate.

Haha, yeah... no... Now the ratings will just stop being accurate...

TBH, if we're going to do this, we might as well just go back to the Like button. It was simple, and worked so well. It also accomplished what seems to be the goal of removing the Dislike button, which is to force people to explain what they're saying. Some of the current ratings - Old...

Thank you, ten thousand times over. If someone's not mature enough to handle being disagreed with, they should be banned preemptively just for that... We don't want those kinds of people on our forum, or (gods forbid) in the game itself. Removing the Disagree button does nothing but pander to...

I don't know why the fuck they got rid of the disagree button, but... I disagree anyway. The reason larger planets lag terribly on non-godlike systems is that they don't have any specific optimization... Even the new occlusion culling, which works wonders on massive ships (which are large single...

Agreed, honestly. If you can agree, you should be able to disagree. Honestly, I still stand by my original opinion. 4x4 grid. Agree --- Disagree | | Like --- Dislike

Well, if Stargate-like portal mechanics work for multiplayer, I see no issue, as long as basic gates let you get from one place to another and back in SP.

Yeah, this sounds good...

I agree. Having dedicated Youtubers like that is great. It's just that often their feature intro/tutorial videos are bloated with randomness and toying around with things. It's fun to watch sometimes, but sometimes I (and others) just don't want to watch them do that.

Hey, I need a console like that in my ship's bridge... I already have the missiles installed after all... It can fire like 12 bright yellow missiles simultaneously, counting turrets..

I think the big question now is, what about chairs? They're supposed to be in this build too, right?

Oh, I might as well note that Permission Modules should work by linking, not by adjacency, while we're on the subject of permissions, and they should also be configureable. For instance, the AIS Eser-Kalan might be restricted to me, all corridor doors and the mess hall doors would be accessible...

Yaaay. Now the little point-defense turrets on my Avar-Kiaan-class Aethi Cruiser will actually mean something. (This is what they were designed to do, originally; they weren't supposed to pull aggro on mobs (They do that and end up dying instantly.) ) Also, now my shuttles shouldn't get wrecked...

Personally, I don't mind the screwing-around-with-stuff videos, but they are not a substitute for a real feature introduction/preview video. If there is any messing around in those videos, it should happen after all of the features are given a proper introduction and (if applicable) how to use...

No, now we need fleet control implemented. Remember, this is just a glitch with the Force Enter command.

In this case, thankfully, yes, but ToyotaSupra still has a point... Some of the videos are a lot longer than they need to be and often full of random screwing around, which shouldn't happen until all the features are introduced. Regardless, it's better than nothing.