Search results

I think it'd be cool if we could farm plants and extract certain types of minerals from them.

I just use old as a surrogate disagree, if we never get it back. I hope we do, but that's a topic for another thread.

A fighter is less of a big deal to lose than a capital. It's also easier to pilot a fighter to take out turrets.

Sometimes people just don't have time to type out a lengthy disagreement to a thread they don't like. Other times, someone else has already posted something that shows my views on the thread and typing it out what would amount to a second time is pointless- just disagreeing with the thread and...

wow, 9 days. What an insane necro. Anything under 30 days is not a necro. Get your dirty necro accusations out of here

Damn, I'm pretty disappointed that we're losing capital ship systems. I like that idea. Players could just use weaker but still functional push engines (once they're reworked to be usable in all directions) instead of thrusters on a hyperdrive ship.

RIP Grass, you were never appreciated while we had you.

They're using it as a surrogate 'disagree' button, which I assume is a piece of purposeful irony, as they disagree with posts saying it shouldn't be readded.

Right.... because a post 10 days after the last one is a necro.

The disagree button is gone? You can't disagree with things anymore. Basically, this is the site owners a big middle finger to anyone who has a different opinion than someone else.

I like this idea, but I also think that Jump Drives should be just that- for short jumps. Warp Gates and the upcoming Hyperdrive are more for long distance travel.

Ok, but there needs to be some sort of passive effect to deactivate plasma. Maybe passive plasma effect messes with the plasma field and disables it.

I've been using the clock for disagree until it gets re-added, if ever. Hopefully we don't lose ALL of our neutral ratings.

We're not asking for a giant ship to be weaker than a small one. We're asking for it to not be the end all to end all. Which, currently, beyond heavily specialized bombers, is it. Also, if you even read the OP, you'd know that a swarm of equally massed ships can't take out a larger ship. The...

I disagree. The ability to embed the turret base into the ship with this suggestion means that ship shields would no longer need to cover turrets.

Where'd it go?

I've wanted this ever since I started playing this game. As well as being a great way for players to build blueprints, test designs, and not worry about pirates, it would be a great thing to teach new players how to play the game.

I think a better idea would be to make weapon fire decrease the charge by a certain amount, maybe 0.0001second/damage? That doesn't sound like a lot, but a decent missile can still easily wipe out a ship's jump counter. Maybe this could be an effect instead, with the passive version resisting...

No, the jump drive works by instantly "jumping" to a location, while the hyperdrive works by making you go extremely, extremely fast, but doesn't actually load the sectors as you fly by. Mushroom fleet has a video of a conversation with @Calbiri explaining how it works.

How would you suggest the aesthetic be? I can kind of see your logic on the matter, but I can't think of any other way to do it off the top of my head.