Search results

The quality is dropping in what way, exactly? Also, the ship size limits mean PvP is something you can actually do without crashing the damn server. EDIT- SS doesn't even have a "tight size limit" for ships! The only limit they have is "don't lag the server with it."

I always love seeing a dev blog at the top of the homepage. Thanks for another great news update, Bench.

The entire point of a positive review on a public forum is to advertise while reeling off details for why they should use whatever is being reviewed. Either that, or discredit a negative review. Which is exactly what this thread was made for.

He posted a negative review. Not everyone is gonna go "wow mike your the best your unfailable i luv ur server everyone who says otherwise is a lier." Get over it.

Positive Review- Mikeland AUS server I love how abusive the admin is! Very good at banning people for having stealth ships, even when said ship follows the rules of being mostly hull covered and having good use of exposed systems. 10/100 would not recommend to a friend

I would suggest Shattered Skies. It seems like a good server.

This is probably the 3rd time I've heard someone leaving Mikelands under a similar story. Admin sounds mad with power to me. Find a new server that isn't hosted by a crazed lunatic. BTW, that's a sick cloaker.

The Fireside Chat channel, presumably.

Alright then. First part of this is a pointless nerf to very small speeder vessels. An additional cockpit should not be required to pilot something. The core should be able to function as a cockpit. The second part of this makes no sense. What does this pre-built skeleton do? How does it...

I don't really like any of these suggestions, but I especially don't like this one. The entire point of the HP system is to make combat NOT core-centric, and yet this continues that. Hey, did you know you can do this already? Use forcefields or glass doors to make an extended shield that can...

Acceleration rather than max speed in a direction is a better choice.

Considering how hull is going to be much more system-like than decoration-like with the HP update, I think hull should count as a functional block on outposts. There should be colony stations as well, but would probably not be as effective as planets. However, if you want to live in a void...

I'd much prefer to Use AI fleets to properly defend locations Have varied resource distribution to give people a reason to fight over territory Change control of systems to give FP instead of draining, give additional uses for FP (convert to credits, hire trade guild or pirate mercs, respawn...

If you leave the sector while a core is overheating it stops overheating, leading to lots of useless cores floating around in sectors that had pirate battles.

How is my post sarcastic, irrational, or already addressed? I see nothing about pointing out the flaws of the 3v1 system, which seemed to be your "grand solution" to the "blowing up homebases while offline" issue.

Implement a credit cost to make a faction. Or make it so you can't make a new faction for a configurable amount of time after deleting one. Or just have server administrators do something about it if someone is abusing it.

It's not that I don't think it's a bad idea to let server owners customize things. It's that I don't think it's worth Schema, Mic, or Briefcase's time to code in these new planet types at this stage of development. I think it would be better suited as a modded in feature than in vanilla. If...

This is literally a thread for debating potential planet shapes, though. What would POSSIBLY be a better thread to discuss this on? If you can't accept that people might disagree with a suggestion, stay out of the suggestion forums.