Search results

I hope turrets become an integral part of their parent entity. That way we can have hundreds of tiny turrets if we feel it necessary, without the massive maintenance cost.

We aren't in real life. We are in a game. For balance purposes, this change makes sense.

This tiny replica of an Executor-class Star Dreadnought from the Star Wars franchise will leave you begging for more as it shocks and awwwwwws your enemies into submission. With a four second, power stable jump drive, perm jam, substantial salvaging array, and vertical torpedo tubes, this ship...

I am always surprised when I see someone using the def UI instead of a ReSkin. Can't wait for the new one :D

Lol. Yeah I noticed one of the pirate stations has a nuke turret. I guess you got an early Christmas present :D

Mini Executor Download: http://starmadedock.net/content/if-mini-executor.1856/ 70 Hour Update (12/19):

I'll post the next update when I can - christmas break with the family :) And yes, I can upload the smaller one, i'll probably do that with the next update.

For consistency. New players would be confused by two conflicting systems.

We would rather not have anyone trying to compare our ships via combat - they really aren't built for it.

*more efficient. Schema needed to unify the weapon and support systems. It didn't make much sense for weapons to use the new system and for the support beams to use the old.

IM AT WAR. I cannot divulge the stats. Sorry. Mine is built for combat (mostly).

I was under the impression this was (mostly) based on looks. My ship's stats are classified for a reason. My faction is in a full-fledged war. I have little choice.

You and me both, pal.

Single-pilot subs are the size of sardine cans.

Yeah, but how many people do you know have built that thing correctly?

Let's build a Borg cube! *angry stares*

Just want to throw this in here so NOONE is confused: You cannot balance a game based on cost alone. Especially not one where the resources are essentially infinite. You must take into account how combat shapes the game and you must adjust the numbers and mechanics accordingly. Cost...

ANOTHER QUESTION! What changes do you have in mind, Schema (or Cal), when you guys say the docking systems will get a new pass? What purpose will a rail system serve?

I agree there is no REALISTIC reason for the change - but for gameplay's sake, it might be completely necessary.

Excepting that the MASS OF THE OBJECT and the SIZE OF THE ENGINES decides it's acceleration. There are a ton of engineering problems associated with moving a free-floating body at high speed and changing that speed quickly. The shear force alone would probably tear the largest ships in half if...