Search results

EMP passive definitely needs a buff. I think it should go up to 75% protection and cost way less energy. EMP passive is a defensive effect. This makes no sense. This thread is about EMP passive. I suggest everyone stop clogging it with their wishlists about EMP offensive.

Alright, first off, shield caps run off this formula. Shields = CapacitorCount * 0.9791797578 * 110 + 220. Which means that your 50 shield caps are actually 5605 shields. Secondly, that's not how the math for ion works. You don't take 60% of your shield capacitor number. You multiply the shields...

You are failing to account for the fact that those 300 ion modules provide more protection than 300 shield caps would.

I have to disagree. Most combat I've been in covers a huge amount of ground as one ship tries to follow another that's backing up or moving to the side.

I wasn't flying a large ship and the only reason I smacked into things was because the server was already lagging, but hey, whatever fits your twisted narrative. The one who needs to learn from their mistakes here is YOU. YOU have the sector sizes too small for combat to be playable, and the...

Oh, I'm sorry, do you like "SERVER UNDER HEAVY LOAD" to constantly play in the background of combat from constant sector switching and sudden unavoidable collisions?

Combat is completely unplayable with these microscopic sector sizes. Please increase them. Thanks.

5 systems is a little overkill, but the range should definitely be larger. Maybe have it have a large "range," but there needs to be activity for longer range detection? Things like jumping, mining, combat, large amounts of thrusters moving, large biomasses doing things (space whales? :P), etc...

Wow, it's a good thing that this kind of abuse is ALREADY ACCOUNTED FOR. Go and try and place some junk blocks like sand on a derelict. Anyway, on the actual suggestion topic- mesh and composite's usefulness is understated by the community. I don't think this is how you make scrap useful. I...

If you think 200 reactors makes a "large ship" then I have some bad news for you. That is TINY. I'm an opponent of rampant gigantism, but this suggestion is just ridiculous. Not to mention to increased lag from rendering all the exposed block faces of these extra tunnels that wouldn't be...

The problem was from a server glitch (this glitch also made the Arstotzkan homeworld vanish) and has since been resolved (both for us and for OOB).

Why is it always a Star Destroyer?

I would suggest having a rule against putting your second homebase in someone elses territory. Other than that, these sound fair.

The Bears are also on NASS if you've destroyed all their SS assets at this point. ;)

fun times today on NASS

I've been having that issue as well.

Rather funny thread to say this in.

No, nerfing implies reduction. Do you think that "nerfing X's cost" is an incorrect way of wording something as well?

It's a nerf to the object's mass :P