Search results

lolll hes saying its a "glaring issue" to not have a rollback feature built in.

thrust.

maybe true calhoun. i not claiming panpiper is trying to cheat the game. im claiming that his ship, during combat, takes advantage of the games crap targeting system, intentional or not... it still happens. as far as it being some kinda exploit, i dont mean to give that impression at all.

i like not having to rely on a laggy buggy mess to spawn ships =p

no

marauder DOES abuse ai aiming mechanics, but that doesnt make it unfair. its just built intelligently, and can be easily beaten at even mass by many other types of ai driven ships.

various people have made 15~ mass ships that hit in the 100k+ range, so thats definitely not true. but i do agree its hard to make nice fighters by realistic measures, just cause no realistically scaled fighter shi pwill be using meter wide hull. even 1/3 slab is 10x what it would be. imo thats...

edymnion... he offered a suggestion and you didnt just counter the point, you shit talked the idea in general. you have a right to your opinion, but so does everyone else, and yours is no more valid than theirs. fwiw, you can call it whatever you like if it helps your narrative... but the 2...

aethetics are purely subjective. performance has some objectivity involved when comparing raw numbers but a lot of opinions go into what you want your ship to accomplish.

well theres not really a rule and stats vary WILDLY depending on your ships design... seen a capable 500 mass ship with 8k shields and one with 120k shields

fixed =D

IGN: Veilith Why you want to join the server: i like to talk while i make grey ships; your shinies are pretty Example of your work: Your favorite type of cake: Lightly salted babies

whats all this then

morts a cruiser

incentivize expansion. make station spawn cost low. make warpgates have longer range. incentivize expansion. nerf warhead availability or dmg:mass. make station only armor blocks that are exceedingly tough but not invincible. incentivize expansion.

as a pvper and someone who likes to play on hardmode servers i think removing homebase protection is a bad idea by default. theres already config options to do this if you want your server to work this way. theres currently no way to protect a base fully without altered block behaviors...

could i get me one of those fancied up bits =D

the fastest and easiest way to do it is use a decent docking heirarchy and just use the up/dwn/ctrl keys to hotswap cores to activate everything within a second or 2 without ever having to get out of a core. but stacking them in your bridge still feels nice for organization and aesthetic.

it collapsed =p

8-12 seems to be the happy compromise