Search results

I'm catching what you're dropping. When I test, I prefer to fight against AI because they almost never miss; even at long range. But I also test with friends in creative mode on Hamachi clients, where we adhere to "Wheaton's Law". We play, we test, we sometimes fight, when someone...

You can believe that if you like but you have no way of knowing exactly what other people test their designs on in single player or for what purpose. For example; I don't fight stock pirates and stations when I test my weapons. As such; the question of whether the opinions of PVPers carry...

Agreed. This is true balance. We live in a world where a fighter can carry a nuclear payload that can flatten a city. Granted; their weapon capacity is far more limited than say an Arleigh Burke class destroyer but both craft pose a significant threat to one another depending on the types...

Um... Yeah. I'm putting you on my "list"...

So does that include those who test the weapons extensively in single player/ build servers or ONLY those who test on other players?

Therein lies the reason we can never have a rational discussion about this topic. I could understand if the game was specifically marketed as a PVP space shooter but it is not, and never has been specifically marketed as such. All logical and reasonable input should be considered in this...

There's nothing wrong with this suggestion. Missiles have been fundamentally broken ever since the explosion mechanic rework. As was requested earlier, constructive feed back is what's needed here; not disagreement for the sake of disagreement. Well, a sparrow missile is about about 3-4...

Quite frankly, every weapon in the game needs a rework and in several cases, a buff. Redoing the damage pulse and fixing the explosive radius for non-missile weapons would be a step in the right direction but that's a topic for another thread so I'll stick to the topic at hand. While missiles...

Only until someone gives him some raspberry jam...

Soooo. You are gonna call it "MicroMade". Nice.;)

I've got my eye on you... ...and this thread. Question; will there be a limit on docked entities and fleet craft?

Sorry... Gimme a minute... Ahhhh... That's better.

Alright... Challenge accepted. You can call it "MicroMade" and I will come dominate your server with hundreds of power armor infantry, vehicles and fighters... FEAR THE MICRO-MINIS!!!

What the... 100 mass? o_O Are you sure you don't mean 100,000 mass? ...because even I don't build at 100 mass. Either way, let me know when you do, provided I don't make one first. My average mass for ships is between 7,000 and 12,000 mass but I don't mind dialing back to 2,000-5,000...

I find that idea extremely hilarious. Unfortunately, area triggers and pickup docking are kinda janky.

As I said before; it's a player behavior issue. Acknowledging that players "demand" it, doesn't change the fact that it's detrimental to multi-player as a whole and inconsiderate to the players who are actively trying to reduce their own impact on lag. "Demand" is kind of a funny word to...

Ummm... What? o_O While an older design (pre-slabs), his little fellow is only 11m x 11m x 7m. My new fighter/bombers will follow a more conventional size range like an F-14 Tomcat (18-19 meters) I anticipate no problems carrying an increased payload internally as well as externally. I...

I kinda like this idea but we'd need to account for weapons customization with regard to size. How about this? - Link a cargo storage system to the weapons computer to determine its magazine size. Refill your magazine when it runs dry. - Manufacture separate, missile and cannon ammo types...

Called it! Don't worry! I've got this!!! For the record; this can't one-shot this <Sarcasm> Sure. Missiles are just fine the way they are... </Sarcasm>