Search results

These should rather be in a priority list. Bugs will be there anyway. ;)

Have you already found the integrated tools for circles, ellipsoids and tori (donuts)?

Thank you for the detailed answer. I was hoping for a solution that doesn't violate these criteria. I did some reasearch and testing to define more precisely what I don't like. I dislike both color combinations and textures. It seems that the different colors of each hull/armor type fit to each...

Shouldn't you be able to solve all problems with the wiki within two days in your cave?

I'm not vying to anything. I'm hoping a certain guy, who claims to be pretty much Picasso, can come up with a solution. Unfortunately there's no place for a decorative layer on a fighter, where every bit of weight is a burden.

Probably a bit late, but I don't like how combinations of hull, standard and advanced armor currently look. I'd like to use the various types depending on how much protection each part of a ship needs, but that looks rather ugly. Combining advanced armor heptas with hull tetras (yes, that makes...

The game somehow has to keep track of the textures used by each block. Where should this information be stored?

⚓ T959 Storage cannot be connected to a Rail Turret Axis.

It was suggested to input the desired angle directly into a rail rotator block to allow for smaller steps than 45°, but schema didn't like that, since it wouldn't match the usual style (which is why I'm happy, that we can at least input text into displays directly, instead of binary ASCII code...

Two words: rail rotators!

AI can predict linear motion, circle strafing is too advanced. In other words: you're too good. How many fighters can be one-shot?

Flying a ship while looking sideways or backwards is of course awkward, but players aren't forced to do that. So I don't see a problem with that, unless it's a technical problem I'm not aware of.

If an active defensive overdrive increased both, the power consumption and the range, schema wouldn't need to add slave mechanics for overdrive. For example, if a jump drive is charged 50% without overdrive and 50% with a maximum bonus overdrive, the range would be 125% (0.5*1 +0.5*1.5).

Well, at least I hope that's the intended way, if not I'd be screwed. The game says it must be a C-shape, and 'C's do curve inward. However, the height and width limitation of shipyards is currently broken, so I can't test it.

I'm pretty sure the AI can still lead the target. It just seems to aim for a point slightly different from the calculated one. Also, I don't think turret accuracy should be artificially lowered for bigger turrets. This would be unexpected behaviour, which had to be learned and memorized. The...

Why would the stick out? They can follow the curves.

The dockers in the weapons menu are identical. I put them in the hot bar an test where the beam comes from and then rearrange them in a logical order.

I already thought we should have logic slabs.

If you have several dockers, how do you find out which one is which, if all their beams originate from the same block?

We could create a planetarium with moving stars.