Search results for query: Meta

I just want SotS dumbfire missile volleys alongside stuff like Star Trek's firing of 6 torpedos sequentially, without unlimited spam of either. Ultimately, I think that just needs a very very small reload for firing delay (like .1 seconds) alongside a capacity that scales somewhat linearly.

...need to make a choice whether to hold large or small missiles. Right. But as long as it's a choice inferior to one big ammo supply, it's against meta and nobody desires it even tough it would archive the goal to let players make a meta-decision about missile size for defining their ships...

That would be better with meta-items. You could have some special food items or special clothing from one faction and customers in another. So every faction could make their export-products and the further you travel the rarer the customers become but also the more they pay (up to 200% maybe).

...with some general forum whose purpose is to move all threads like this one into it. I would call it something like "Development Meta". I DONT KNOW. Just brainstorming. The main purpose is that discussions whose OP targets topics that are just general rambling about alot of aspect of the...

I believe integrity is per system and not shipwide(or else you would just make a giant cube of capsule somewhere then ignore integrity for all the rest).

...about whether the game is gud or not, which is an issue for the General forum. It might also be good to have a sub-forum wherein we can corral meta-discussion of how the game should or should not be developed, etc. To ensure that players can use the forums to ask about and discuss relevant...

...For ShipA, any Isanth would fit. Retrofit it until certain combat or speed cap is maxed out, go to next, repeat. Then you have shipB which is a meta-build. For ShipB, I have once build a pyramid ship on sunworld ° maxed out reactor-power with a set number of Squares missing a block at one...

Killer. Yeah. Let's brainstorm this shit. Start a thread?

It's just not written with that purpose in mind. And I said brainstorming. Why not make a forum thats called "development meta" where all garbage "Schine sux" shit gets dumped?

I am not a fan of it either. Because it is only another step to satisfaction from a different viewpoint, not satisfaction-code itself. We used to have weapon-slider UI for range, damage, projectile speed and fire rate, some time ago. The bad thing about it was, that it wasn'T an option, but a...

...back in some manner under the new system: The added HP was small, but it added up in some builds. This did not allow decorated ships to fight meta ships, but it mattered in battles between decorated ships. SHP made the difference between "minimal decorations" and "a few more decorations"...

TL;DR. I don't think they are bringing back SHP. reactor HP is the most logical system.

I like this idea, but at the same time with what we have now (at least in my experience) a ship is generally a mission kill long before the reactor goes critical.

...a sort of "critical hit" system that could blow up your ship much faster with a precise (or lucky) shot to the reactor. There's not a lot of meta-reasoning here. This is just what I think would be fun to play and fight with. Ship HP Before the power update, ship HP seemed fine. There were a...

I don't understand this thread title. It's basically asking: "Is meta actually meta?" By Power 2.0 optimization do you mean making your power 2.0 ship as efficient as possible? If so, yes. Making a Meta ship is infact Meta. You don't seem to understand what Meta means. It is not a specific style...

...state the obvious (that RP is doing fine despite the game's weak developmental state) and then try to explain why the game is "fine without PVP/META". Your TL;DR and the use of the word "toxic" implies all is good and don't worry about PVP/RP/RTS. etc. As such, you inadvertently picked a...

As delusional op i can just point at the tl:dr as it states: CURRENT starmade BUILD is better without pvp/meta since its not fun, Roleplay does not really need balancing so its the way to go and make the best with what we got. or recommend to reread the post. As there seems to be no hint to a...

...the same advantage; as PVE is lacking in content and competent AI while PVP is so poorly thought out that victory depends on following a single META or abusing exploits. Whatever your play-style preference, I think we can all agree that this game needs some serious work to make it as...