Disabling Systems after HP % is Pointless, PART TWO!

    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Joined
    Feb 11, 2015
    Messages
    152
    Reaction score
    49
    • Community Content - Bronze 1
    • Legacy Citizen 4
    Le wild me opens SMD Forums to see is there soemthing new, and sees this therad as the most recent one.

    How on earth is this not locked due to massive derailing or anything like that?

    You stated that you do not like the system, but i have not seen you point out to any actual flaws. There is no point in keeping this thread. THE END.

    P.S. I do not care that you come form MF, for all i care you could have come form the Mars and i would still be irritated by your pointless posts.
     
    Last edited:
    Joined
    Oct 11, 2013
    Messages
    797
    Reaction score
    441
    • Competition Winner - Stations
    • Master Builder Bronze
    • Thinking Positive
    I like the new system. Lots of others do too. You don't.

    I have yet to hear of any feature like this being removed from Starmade just because some whiny fella didn't like it. So far I've only seen more pros than cons to this feature and the graphs say more than enough. If ya got something clever to say, be sure to do so. On topic enough?
     

    Mered4

    Space Triangle Builder
    Joined
    Jan 12, 2014
    Messages
    662
    Reaction score
    190
    • Community Content - Bronze 2
    • Purchased!
    • Legacy Citizen 4
    I like the new system. Lots of others do too. You don't.

    I have yet to hear of any feature like this being removed from Starmade just because some whiny fella didn't like it. So far I've only seen more pros than cons to this feature and the graphs say more than enough. If ya got something clever to say, be sure to do so. On topic enough?
    "I like the new system. Lots of others do too. You don't."
    I'll quote this for you:
    "But I DO LIKE IT. Where in the hell did you guys get this notion that I don't like the HP system? It's LIGHTYEARS ahead of what we had before. Does it need tweaking? Sure! But so does the entire game. It's alpha!"
    Le wild me opens SMD Forums to see is there soemthing new, and sees this therad as the most recent one.

    How on earth is this not locked due to massive derailing or anything like that?

    You stated that you do not like the system, but i have not seen you point out to any actual flaws. There is no point in keeping this thread. THE END.

    P.S. I do not care that you come form MF, for all i care you could have come form the Mars and i would still be irritated by your pointless posts.
    "yet to point any actual flaws"
    Earlier in the thread.....I said this:
    "I simply noticed this feature that has the following characteristics:

    1) It does not solve an existing gameplay issue. Thus, it is meant to either improve a system in the game already (the HP System) or to add a new feature.
    2) It adds on to an already existing feature - namely, that of block loss from weapons fire. In my tests, block loss was significant enough on ships larger than 50k mass to significantly limit the vessel's performance. When I say significant, I mean that it was behaving erratically and many of its systems were so heavily damaged that specific functions on the ship were practically nonexistent.

    Using the brain I was given at birth, I deduced that, in regular combat, there is no need to disable the systems when they are already being literally destroyed by weapons fire. I also tested this theory and found that while it holds true for both very large and very small ships, there is a middle ground (about twice the width of a Beam-Missile explosion radius) where the feature is useful. It is useful because the ship is basically already dead in the water due to missiles, but is just above the threshold for overheating."

    Perhaps you guys should try trolling someone who doesn't pay attention :)
     

    therimmer96

    The Cake Network Staff Senior button unpusher
    Joined
    Jun 21, 2013
    Messages
    3,603
    Reaction score
    1,053
    • Legacy Citizen 10
    • Top Forum Contributor
    I'm sorry, but who is trolling you? You MF folk love saying that SMD is full of trolls, but always seem lack any sort of proof
     
    Joined
    Oct 11, 2013
    Messages
    797
    Reaction score
    441
    • Competition Winner - Stations
    • Master Builder Bronze
    • Thinking Positive
    I'm sorry, but who is trolling you? You MF folk love saying that SMD is full of trolls, but always seem lack any sort of proof
    + Seem to have fun calling us trolls and getting reactions.

    Owh, I think I caught a hook on my tentacle. SAYONARA BABY
     

    Mered4

    Space Triangle Builder
    Joined
    Jan 12, 2014
    Messages
    662
    Reaction score
    190
    • Community Content - Bronze 2
    • Purchased!
    • Legacy Citizen 4
    + Seem to have fun calling us trolls and getting reactions.

    Owh, I think I caught a hook on my tentacle.
    What reactions? You've yet to reply to my argument with a logical rebuff. I'm actually laughing my ass off right now.

    The "realism" argument is already out the window. That's been brought up three times and I've had to reply the exact same way each time.
     
    Joined
    Feb 11, 2015
    Messages
    152
    Reaction score
    49
    • Community Content - Bronze 1
    • Legacy Citizen 4
    "I like the new system. Lots of others do too. You don't."
    I'll quote this for you:
    "But I DO LIKE IT. Where in the hell did you guys get this notion that I don't like the HP system? It's LIGHTYEARS ahead of what we had before. Does it need tweaking? Sure! But so does the entire game. It's alpha!"

    "yet to point any actual flaws"
    Earlier in the thread.....I said this:
    "I simply noticed this feature that has the following characteristics:

    1) It does not solve an existing gameplay issue. Thus, it is meant to either improve a system in the game already (the HP System) or to add a new feature.
    2) It adds on to an already existing feature - namely, that of block loss from weapons fire. In my tests, block loss was significant enough on ships larger than 50k mass to significantly limit the vessel's performance. When I say significant, I mean that it was behaving erratically and many of its systems were so heavily damaged that specific functions on the ship were practically nonexistent.

    Using the brain I was given at birth, I deduced that, in regular combat, there is no need to disable the systems when they are already being literally destroyed by weapons fire. I also tested this theory and found that while it holds true for both very large and very small ships, there is a middle ground (about twice the width of a Beam-Missile explosion radius) where the feature is useful. It is useful because the ship is basically already dead in the water due to missiles, but is just above the threshold for overheating."

    Perhaps you guys should try trolling someone who doesn't pay attention :)
    Oh boy, I am in a great mood for rational arguments so lets se what i can dig out from that.
    1) It solves a probem.
    SHP scales with size, that meaning that your titan will not only get destroyed sooner than before, but it will also start to "misbehave" sooner. The bigger the systems, the sooner after taking dmg they will start to underpreform. Choose any of the real life examples.
    Oh, and before you try to use "but these are not connected, systems, rather individual modular components that each...."
    Power regen and storage are connected (unless you dislike group bonuses, which is fine). Weapons are connected, and the only things that are not are Jump drives, thrusters and shields, tho i would like some connecting bonus done for the jump drives....

    2)Do you put all of your systems mixed or do you separate them?
    This system allows, no actualy, encourages smart system placing, spaced armour, and inner hull sections, all of which are used in anything that has to do with combat.
    You are now able to utilize these things to a much greater potential than previous. Also, i tend to think of the block loss as a complementary feature now, rather than a stand alone one...
     
    Joined
    Oct 11, 2013
    Messages
    797
    Reaction score
    441
    • Competition Winner - Stations
    • Master Builder Bronze
    • Thinking Positive
    What reactions? You've yet to reply to my argument with a logical rebuff. I'm actually laughing my ass off right now.
    Ironically I'm thinking the exact same of you right now. Read your own threads m8, I have yet to see you reply reasonable to other's arguments. Everyone's probably done being reasonable right now because nothings penetrating your thick skull. I've seen plenty of valid points in the previous threads, and you're still going on? Like, what's your goal in all this, dude?
     

    Mered4

    Space Triangle Builder
    Joined
    Jan 12, 2014
    Messages
    662
    Reaction score
    190
    • Community Content - Bronze 2
    • Purchased!
    • Legacy Citizen 4
    Ironically I'm thinking the exact same of you right now. Read your own threads m8, I have yet to see you reply reasonable to other's arguments. Everyone's probably done being reasonable right now because nothings penetrating your thick skull. I've seen plenty of valid points in the previous threads, and you're still going on? Like, what's your goal in all this, dude?
    I wasn't "going on." I threw out a rebuff for the few logical arguments thrown at me, and I get lambasted as someone who is stubborn and doesn't like the current system because I disagree with a part of it. I defended myself and attempted to drive the thread back into the topic, where the circle repeats itself. Watch - my next paragraph or two will have you guys calling me all sorts of crazy names.

    Oh boy, I am in a great mood for rational arguments so lets se what i can dig out from that.
    I'm so glad you decided to be rational. Thank you!

    1) It solves a probem.
    What problem? There was not a problem to begin with. The HP System already fixed the core-drilling problem.
    SHP scales with size, that meaning that your titan will not only get destroyed sooner than before, but it will also start to "misbehave" sooner. The bigger the systems, the sooner after taking dmg they will start to underpreform. Choose any of the real life examples.
    Oh, and before you try to use "but these are not connected, systems, rather individual modular components that each...."
    Power regen and storage are connected (unless you dislike group bonuses, which is fine). Weapons are connected, and the only things that are not are Jump drives, thrusters and shields, tho i would like some connecting bonus done for the jump drives....
    Again, the realism argument holds no weight in this discussion. I've already explained the meta twice. If we are going to change it, fine. Let's change it. I haven't heard anything about it changing from Schema, however, so I'm going to assume that it will be staying the same.

    "The bigger the systems, the sooner after taking dmg they will start to underpreform. "

    Hold up. Are you trying to say that this system adds nerfs to big ships? What?
    A whole feature designed to nerf big ships? keptick : dude, it's happening.
    2)Do you put all of your systems mixed or do you separate them?
    This system allows, no actualy, encourages smart system placing, spaced armour, and inner hull sections, all of which are used in anything that has to do with combat.
    You are now able to utilize these things to a much greater potential than previous. Also, i tend to think of the block loss as a complementary feature now, rather than a stand alone one...
    It does encourage smart system placement. The HP System, not this feature. This feature doesn't really encourage anything. Unless, of course, you count pleading with your attacker to spare you at 55% HP.

    Remember, we aren't talking about the HP System, we are discussing the disabling of systems after 55% structure HP.
    [DOUBLEPOST=1435166402,1435166212][/DOUBLEPOST]schema
    Are we going to be changing the meta from a modular explanation to a realism explanation? Is that in the works? The gentlemen here seem to believe it's already changed. Could you please clarify? Thanks.
     

    CyberTao

    鬼佬
    Joined
    Nov 10, 2013
    Messages
    2,564
    Reaction score
    641
    • Legacy Citizen 4
    • Railman Gold
    • Thinking Positive
    Well, you mentioned Schema. It's pretty clear at this point you never wanted our opinions, so this whole thing would have done better as a PM to Schine instead of a thread in General Discussion. Ah well, I just got here and there is only 1 thing left to do.

     

    Mered4

    Space Triangle Builder
    Joined
    Jan 12, 2014
    Messages
    662
    Reaction score
    190
    • Community Content - Bronze 2
    • Purchased!
    • Legacy Citizen 4
    Well, you mentioned Schema. It's pretty clear at this point you never wanted our opinions, so this whole thing would have done better as a PM to Schine instead of a thread in General Discussion. Ah well, I just got here and there is only 1 thing left to do.

    I'm asking so they have no excuse to continue down their line of reasoning. I've already shown the conditions for it to be true, and until those conditions are met, the argument remains untrue. I'm here to have a discussion with this part of the community. Schema makes his own decisions, regardless of whether or not he reads this thread. In the end, however, Schema is the one I aim to persuade, not the trolls in this thread.
     

    Winterhome

    Way gayer than originally thought.
    Joined
    Jun 29, 2013
    Messages
    1,929
    Reaction score
    636
    I'm asking so they have no excuse to continue down their line of reasoning. I've already shown the conditions for it to be true, and until those conditions are met, the argument remains untrue. I'm here to have a discussion with this part of the community. Schema makes his own decisions, regardless of whether or not he reads this thread. In the end, however, Schema is the one I aim to persuade, not the trolls in this thread.

    That explains why you're discouraging discussion that doesn't support your point of view, attacking people over having different viewpoints on game mechanics (whereas others are attacking you for being a jerk - there's a huge difference), constantly moving the goalposts, and claiming others' opinions as invalid by calling them "trolls" when they attempt to give you a logical explanation why something is how it is. You cannot ask for "logic" while abandoning it yourself.
     
    Joined
    Apr 24, 2013
    Messages
    436
    Reaction score
    73
    • Legacy Citizen 3
    I'm asking so they have no excuse to continue down their line of reasoning. I've already shown the conditions for it to be true, and until those conditions are met, the argument remains untrue. I'm here to have a discussion with this part of the community. Schema makes his own decisions, regardless of whether or not he reads this thread. In the end, however, Schema is the one I aim to persuade, not the trolls in this thread.
    Again, do you honestly expect anyone to listen or care about what you have to say after acting like you have? Get lost son, we are done with you.

    If wish to persuade ONE person, make a PM, don't come here and whine when people don't agree with you.
     

    FlyingDebris

    Vaygr loves my warhead bat.
    Joined
    Sep 6, 2013
    Messages
    2,458
    Reaction score
    1,312
    • Top Forum Contributor
    • Councillor Gold
    • Legacy Citizen 4
    I have yet to hear of any feature like this being removed from Starmade just because some whiny fella didn't like it.
    The OOOOOOLD docking system. Some Reddit tard made a post and got them to change it. So yeah blame him for years and years of docking boxes.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.