Power Regeneration Mechanics

    Joined
    Feb 18, 2013
    Messages
    7
    Reaction score
    0
    • Legacy Citizen 2
    • Legacy Citizen
    *Disclaimer* I have not done testing at extremely high power regeneration levels, so some of this may not always apply
    After seeing some discussion in public chat about power regen, I decided to do some testing of my own to determine just how it actually works. Some of this will probably seem obvious to you mega builders and reactor-configuration masterminds, but hopefully this will shed some insight to others.
    1 - Power regeneration is quadratic. For each block that extends a reactor in any given dimension, the gains in regen will be greater and greater.
    2 - Regeneration is NOT proportional to the volume of the box that would inscribe your reactor. Rather, block for block, the gains in regen from expanding into any dimension will be the same as if you had only extended your reactor in one dimension. For example, a "cross" type reactor that is 15x15x1 will provide the same power regeneration as a "needle" reactor that is 1x1x30. Both reactors expand 30 units into three-dimensional space, and as such, have the same regen.
    3 - Separate power groups scale independently. If you have one 15x15x1 reactor, you will get exactly the same amount of regen from adding another, separate 15x15x1 reactor.
    What does this mean? Not much, except for clarifying how the game actually calculates regen. For builders of large ships, it does mean that reactors should always run the full length of the longest axis of your ship to get the greatest gains in power regeneration. It also means that per unit mass, the most efficient reactor configuration will always be a single reactor expanding infinitely in any dimension. This is not an ideal solution, however, as no one wants sector-spanning spindly spaceships :P
    I'll leave the floor open to anyone who would like to talk about more space-efficient reactor configurations, that particular area is not my strong suit.
     
    Joined
    Jan 1, 2013
    Messages
    772
    Reaction score
    452
    #2 is not correct, expanding a 15/15/1 into a 15/15/2 is far greater gains than a 1/1/15 into a 1/1/16,
    a good rule of thumb
    -always increase the smallest dimension for the greatest gains
     
    Joined
    Feb 18, 2013
    Messages
    7
    Reaction score
    0
    • Legacy Citizen 2
    • Legacy Citizen
    Comparing a 15x15x1 reactor to a 1x1x15 reactor is akin to comparing a 1x1x30 to a 1x1x15. According to my first rule, you will obviously get more power regen out of expanding the larger reactor than the smaller one. I will try to rephrase #2 if it is not clear.
     
    Joined
    Jan 1, 2013
    Messages
    772
    Reaction score
    452
    Sorry, I just used the example sizes you listed. I just want to help people understand. Regardless, my tip is still valid :) hope it helps
     
    Joined
    Apr 14, 2013
    Messages
    12
    Reaction score
    0
    currently this is the most efficient way of generating power*





    *that i know of
     
    Joined
    Apr 9, 2013
    Messages
    22
    Reaction score
    0
    • Legacy Citizen 9
    I\'ll be the first person to admit that your 5x5x5 design is the most effecient to-date. However, it is by far the most efficient way of generating power. Power is not limited to just a cube nor is stacking multiple of those cubes a good idea.

    Case in point, 5 power lines that fan out 150 in each direction but in single file will be a much more efficient use of space than 150 of those cores. lining the inside of your Borge cube with long lines would give you a much higer power output and regen than your cubes. In a small shuttle, the cube wins out.