Search results

i just want for fps to start dropping if the faction has no one online for x amount of time. I hate one man factions with one homebase acting as traps or just taking up space with alts.

This works only if the purpose is to not allow a player to control a ship. Right now if you despawn the core, you despawn everything. If there was a way to despawn only the core and make the rest a "structure", i don't see why you couldn't plop a build block, get inside and put another core in...

Right now, if faction A attacks B with auto declare enabled: A gets a mail and a news post with the responsible B just gets a mail with the auto declare I'd like complete info on both sides: - Responsible -Time -Location

these are not suggestions, but complaints. Some of these issues are already on their way to be improved on.

By selecting a ship and clicking a hotkey ( or scanning the system) you could get dimension info, if not additional info related to systems of a ship/station.

it requires more blocks when there's no real need for them. Very few succesful mmorpgs limit the chat to a game mechanic (and i can't really think of one right now). As for game immersion, there are far more things that break it, like server lag, fps inconsistency, crashes, etc. And personally...

sneaky necro is sneaky.

The way alliance tax is handled in a game i frequent is this: There's a tax on income (i play on the redshift server and this could be applied to player to player credit transactions) There's a tax, if the leader wants, in bank deposits. This way bulk trades that involve credits contribute to...

i just don't think we need more propulsion systems right now. the jump distance is configurable, as is the top speed. Let's also not forget that we have warpgates. Warpgates is the equivalent to fast travel, while jump drives are vehicles/riding animals and thrusters = walking.

+1 +1 yes plz. NPC shops imo don't make that much of a difference, since they can hold little resources at a time, making them more expensive just means less resources to buy until shop fills with cash. Bulk trade is done, in my experience, player to player (Perhaps a Broker UI would be...

right now i have no way of knowing how much each individual system costs and what factors are actually taken into account for its calculation. i'd like a dropdown of my systems and how much they each cost per turn.

water + lava = warpgate module :P

there are binary spiral galaxies, galaxies which are just the "center" (no arms) and those are cloud like or disc like. Depends on the age of the galaxy

I'd like to see a tree-like structured faction rank system, fully editable (even chain of command). People with the same ranks may not want other people on the same rank to use their ships, or they may want to team up as a squadron within the faction, etc.

Your post began arguing for exploring, and how jump drives take away that. Every method you propose either blinds you, makes you go incredibly fast (which can't be good for the server to have to load and unload sectors constantly), more so than jump drives or is not much different that current...

i'd like to see different shaped galaxies, not just the default spiral. Probably suggested before...

Pretty sure both ideas have been thrown around before. I suggest we wait until we get the docking/rails update thats coming

Right now if you show check the by relation box, it shows every faction. i propose a sub filter: neutral, friend and enemy, and only show those systems.

realism aside, i could just blow up the core and mine the different planet parts...

while great for eye candy in theory, the end result would be still 2 players facing off with a bunch of ships instead of one, which will no doubt increase the load in the server. I love the idea, but it veers away from the concept of teamplay, since a one man empire can control a whole fleet at...