I did not know that was a rule. Thanks for clarifying since the NASS rules are not posted anywhere easily accessible. I feel like it is an interesting rule since destroying an enemies home is how you defeat them.
Guess you didn\'t want to win then... and Obi, compared to the DFN yes the Vaygr was successful in the attacks. Also, there is no reason why you couldn\'t do the same thing. It would only be unfair if it was impossible for you to also attack at night with your largest ships, which it wasn\'t...
How I see it is that his faction is very loyal to stay up late to attack... maybe if you had shown the same determination then your base wouldn\'t have been undefended.
In every war, real or in game, there will be a winner. If there appears to be no winner then the war really hasn\'t ended. And also, have you heard of something people like to do called role playing? If you understand what it is then you will realize that Zoro knows this is a game better than...
My idea on drones is that you could hook up docks to a drone computer and so when you release the drones they will attack enemy ships until you reactivate the computer, calling them back to their docks. This would allow for people to create their own drones and also it would prevent an...
That is really good to know. Thanks. I was led to believe that the beam had to be touching a power block. Maybe it was an update that changed it. I will have to keep this in mind while designing support ships.
Just to point this out; in order to use a power drain beam you have to be able to shoot it at power blocks, this would mean that you would still have to break through the shields. Good luck.
Thank you for correcting me. You still don\'t have an excuse to be a bias admin though. Nothing can justify that unless zorro is breaking official rules.
The DFN hasn\'t set up a time either so please stop being a biased admin. Your job is to be neutral so please do that because I want to be able to respect you. Thanks you.
When I first read that Faction homes can not be damaged I was very surprised since this seemed very odd to me. I now understand that it is an anti-troll mechanic but I do not think that things docked to the base should also be invincible, only the actual base should be protected. Allowing...
I do see you argument though since the second rule. However I was signing this on behalf of me and I had never consulted with Vaygr about signing. I have also talk about leaving this treaty multiple times before the attack since it is practically what faction alliances are. Aka the UAF and...
Isn\'t this a treaty to prevent forum wars? This treaty was created to prevent another Troller from happening. So sorry but yet again this doesn\'t apply
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.