Search results

@Rifter: http://star-made.org/content/buy-starmade

Its really hard to tell whats going on from that picture, if you scroll down through the weapons computer does it show them all with the same damage (25.3) or are some different? Also you appear to have two weapon computers, what is attached to each? Also why do you have so many single arrays...

That was pretty hard to read, and understand, but could you show exactly how the AMC\'s are arranged and attached (purple outline) to the computer? Picture of the Weapon Menu with the AMC CPU selected would be good as well. To fix the random location they shoot from, exit the ship and press...

Screenshot?

Did you delete and recreate this thread?

Well anyone can get those keys AND more for however much they want from the bundle right now, and I think you even admitted to it in your first post before you deleted it.

They cheated, its multiple docked ships stuck together using a glitch in docking

You already made this topic a few days ago and got called out for trying to give away www.humblebundle.com keys.

What exactly are you trying to do?

Here is a good explaination of why the outside cockpit seems to move fast compared to the actual core speed: http://web.mit.edu/2.972/www/reports/differential/differential.html The outside has to move farther than the inside, so while it looks much faster (and is...) the actual turn...

Yeah, even before, like 100 mass it starts to feel slow. I made a fighter @ around 50 mass, covered it in hull for \"looks\" (since hull does crap to prevent actual damage), and it ended up around 150ish, and felt so much slower, and was so much worse in combat because I lost the speed /...

He is saying that a ship under 500 mass and one over 1700 are the same...

No you didn\'t read what I wrote. I said \"A single stand alone power block gives 141 power\", as in a SINGLE BLOCK. And again, why would you build your ship with space for a reactor, when you could just randomly throw power blocks around whereever and have it be just as, or more efficient than...

Its a random bug that occurs, just exit the ship and press \"R\" to set the block to be the output block

I notice they are both inefficient for space yep. You are averaging only 136 power per block in the top, and 141 on the bottom A single stand alone power block gives 141 power. So you are gaining absolutely no benefit from stacking them, and the top one you are actually LOSING efficiency per...

Yeah.. ARM processors aren\'t comparible to desktop / laptop ones. I\'m not saying there couldn\'t be a version of the game (or even just ship editor or something), but the CPU on a phone has much less power than those on computers.

Why would I tell people how to play the game, I was just pointing out that its not efficient to have a \"reactor\".

Oh I get that, and I\'ve heard of Calibri\'s 80 million regen monster, but I don\'t understand why you\'d ever need something like that since A) The game can\'t handle it,and B) You\'d just need to increase your thruster count a ton to be able to haul all of those docked ships around (once the...

I said \"line\", which I use as short hand for the ever expanding box dimensions. So its not a straight line of 350 blocks, but one that could be 100 x 100 x 150 like I mentioned in my original post. Anyway, what I\'m trying to say is that for mass (and thus internal space taken) \"reactor\"...

The problem is, its much better to just stack more shields on a fighter until you hit 256+ at which point you flip over to 1 second recovery vs half second. Each shield will provide more protection than hardened hull for the mass it adds. You need to keep small ships.. small, or else you lose...