Search results

I'm leaning towards mass based enhancer blocks rather than dimensional enhancers. That way you could just dedicate, say, a 3x3x3 area to docking enhancers beneath your mid size turrets, or something. Get rid of boxdim enhancers so we can dock things as long as they wouldn't collide with the...

They already are .PNG. That is not an issue, but it is definitely an inconvenience. It would not be a mandatory setting, and the default would stay at PNG. But *options* are *options* and therefore would have the potential to increase accessibility in the community. That's why it's not actual...

This would be better if the parts weren't really classified as such, but were pieces of debris that could be cut off and welded to your own ship. Maybe the classification of devices would be determined by their design efficiency. :I

I already tested this out. They don't penetrate shields - they do damage the same way missiles do. As far as I can tell, it adds the per-block damage for every block hit by the explosion together, and deals that damage to the shields instead of simply bypassing the shields. I'm going to have...

So, I've noticed that screenshots are by default saved as .PNG files. This is fine for the most part. However, it can cause some moderate inconveniences when it comes to uploading and downloading said screenshots to image servers, most notably in the form of exceptionally high data usage. You...

I think it's because people were thinking adding a decorative block would take some sort of monumental effort on schema's part, while in reality, all the work could be done entirely by kupu, right down to adding them in the block editor and submitting them to schema for inclusion in an update.

Currently not ingame. Not sure about the exact details, but it's just a matter of kupu getting them textured and schema adding the blocks to official release, colors and all.

There's even more pain if the ship was designed in a horribly convoluted manner like most of my earlier stuff. Throwaway ships with extreme efficiency are difficult to fix - things like winding power rods, oddly placed thrusters, etc. Hence being throwaway. You want an easy ship to fix, you get...

They can just buy a new one, but it feels like a waste if the ship is still remotely capable of functioning. Personally, I kill and mine because I'm not enough of a jerk to make people suffer. Of course, if they do something to deserve it, I'll happily bombard them with dozens of weak missiles...

Alternately, massive ships carrying dockable cargo containers with external FTL drives in addition to normal sublight drives. Amazing FTL speed, crap sublight, moderate shielding, and few weapons.

There are a few members of the community who are decent with music production.

#1's entire intent is being nondescript other than the shape. Will add more coloration to #2, though really, the current idea is intimidation. I'm leaning towards yellow detailing. Large ships really have no option but to be heavily detailed, of course.

Created a few ships earlier that I'm gonna go ahead and discontinue since I'm unsatisfied with their looks. Might post a few of them later. This thread's gonna be dedicated to my newer ships. Presenting... The Dart, a permajamming fighter. Mass: 61.5 Thrust: 81.9 Energy: 36315 e/s Shields...

I'm pretty sure we're getting different weapon and beam colors in the future.

It could theoretically work if, say, you had 80 blocks between the front splitting block and the core.

Chiki briki i v damke. c:

Personally, I'd prefer if it were a combination. The complexity of the engine should increase thrust output, but not as much as pure quantity, resulting in the need for both blocking and complex thruster design.

Shops would be vastly improved on the RP aspect if they included a warehouse and a trading guild docking port. Perhaps ship docks of varying sizes, couple of capship docks at the top and bottom, etc. They also need turrets. Someone design a shop to replace the vanilla ones, and maybe a megashop...

A lot of this is based around the idea that the target is going to be moving in a straight line. It works with the vast majority of people, but if a target knows that it's at war, it's not going to take the shortest path all the time. Perhaps placing a turret mine +2x, -2x, +2y, and -2y would...

Congratulations, you have become a hitscan projectile.