Search results

It would entirely fit in. The games entire premise is having extremely cusomisable ships made of cubes, heck we are even getting massive ammounts of weapon options soon, and god knows what else. So yes, it would fit in.

That could equally work, but would remove too much freedom in my opinion.

Suggestion. Rather than preset mass dependent sounds, why not just program in a customizable sound editor for the engines? What if someone wants to make a capital that sounds like a F1 car? Are you going to deny them? What if someone wants a deep bass sounding fighter?

I +1 this idea. After all, turrets dont bloody clip into stuff on any other vehicle, and ingame, the current system looks stupid.

I must go agasint this. Big ships can have less acceleration, yes, less turn speed, yes, but NOT speed, last time i checked, a bottle rocket does not go as fast as a space shuttle, nor does a dune buggy go faster than a buggtti veyron. Simply put, any object, regardless of size, can reach the...

As a ship builder, i intentionally make my capitals with lower than standard acceleration. I do so as resepct for fighters, and the fact that high acceleration capitals look stupid.

Being that the new weapons are coming soon, renaming the weapon is pointless. +1 close thread.

I wish that there were more advanced damage systems. But alas, in the current state of the game, allowing ships to break apart uses up a SHIT LOAD of resources. As in, you better have a three thousand dollar computer to use break off.

Roughly (in terms of energy produced), a single teaspoon equates to a hydrogen bomb. The shots ingame (if they were antimatter) are far larger than a teaspoon, and thus should be killing virtually anything in a few direct hits (barring shields). The current ingame weapon appears to simply be a...

Just remove the credit cap, and tripple the blueprint price. Massive ships allready reach the cap, thus removing it, and making it more expensive, will help.

An 18k block capital ship would take about an hour to build itself, whereas a 100 block fighter would take only 20 seconds. How about no? Because my personal ship I use to RP (consisting of more than two million blocks), would take...oooh... Over one hundred hours to make. Yeah, no mate, I...

Assuming the size of the antimatter \"bolt\" is about....0.25m cubed, it should vaporise even a 800m long ship in one shot. One teaspoon of antimatter is virtually a hydrogen bomb...

I think all AMC should have the same level of deviation (5 degrees spread?), but as above suggested, you should be able to modify the spread at the cost of other stats.

I know that, but instead of making turrets retarded, why not make AMC\'s spread? Even the most accurate gun on earth has minor deviations. Granted we dont have 1m cube antimatter cannons, but you get the idea.

Honestly, i think a massive shield nerf for large vessels could be done, and capitals would still be fine. Simply put. Fighter

Seems like OP didnt do his homework from what i have seen. OP, read the wiki, forums, whatever. Then you will understand where you screwed up.

To nitpick, one can never have enough dakka... Never enough...

Docking via \"landing\" could be stupidly exploity. Just imagine your shooting at someone, just for them to crash into a homebase and become invincible. For that matter, have you even played this game? I can understand maybe landing a fighter on a planet, but you can get the same result by...

Ohh look, he is back, and bumping his own OP\'s again.

Honestly, i would post better crititzism here, but if you have read any of this guys other threads, you may understand why i do not.