Search results

Thing is though, resources are less in demand than pilots once you get going on your server for a couple days. Meaning realistically, those 3 pilots should be flying their own frigates. Why should they go smaller? Fighter wings are fun and neat, but currently should only be used if you cannot...

You serious? That server sounds absolutely awful. I've never played on a server that threatened a ban for interacting or getting close to planets. Also, rendering textures & displaying block textures is all local on your PC, how does that lag a server? The admins are arguing its the blocks...

Besides DPS, this is the main cause of fighters being useless. Reduce lock-on turning radius & response, give some kind of warning that a missile is locked onto your ship....then fighters won't be (as) crappy anymore. Missile mobility penalty or no-lock for AI trying to use lock-ons vs. a jammed...

Do some research on docked logic power supply batteries, OP. The latest patch made them viable again. The softcap is a good thing. As has been said time and time again....been there done that. It was awful for balance when big ships had near-infinite power generation back in the day.

Don't worry OP. When the HP system comes in armor won't be worthless anymore. SOON™ Not to hijack your thread, but maybe armor values on stations should be automatically increased. So non-homebase-protected stations have a shot of surviving. Obviously not to indestructible levels like 100% or...

tl;dr Turrets shouldn't get mothership shields. Would further encourage gigantism and gigantic invinci-turrets with ridiculous DPS. Once a good auto-repair system is in place it won't be annoying replacing turrets all the time. Being able to actually pick off turrets is one of the cool...

Did the trick for me, thanks!

Not sure how related this is to the issues you guys are seeing, but here's a .gif of what I see with the new update (this and chunks disappearing): AMD Phenom II X4 955 Radeon 7870

Server specs?

I kinda wish that projectiles would fire from the facing of the weapon array's output block instead of computer facing. Might be less confusing to new players, and if you have vertically fired weapons systems your computers inside the cockpit won't look weird.

I'd like to see at least double speed for sure on the standard vanilla config, just for testing. Then move up if that's still not good enough. But yeah, definitely way too slow right now. Although, I think dumbfires being as fast as cannons is way too much. Also, reduce turning radius on...

That would be really cool.

Self explanatory. A server owner defined limit that stops players from adding blocks to a ship (and accounting for docked entities). Also enforces uploaded BPs, of course. Already suggested nearly a year ago (and maybe elsewhere) in...

Just do it like Space Engineers. Having more slots would definitely be nice for those multi-system ships.

Might be the only way. Although I kinda like seeing the ecological damage and ruination to planets that surface scraping does.

Ask to make the main (non-exploit) resource acquisition method in the game bannable? Nice. Anyways, this isn't going anywhere. I can admit some of us are impatient with one-man programmer alpha progress and direction. I use to repeat the same shit you're saying to me to others. But hell, I...

I haven't worked with custom block configs in a year or so, can any block have any properties now? For example: make something that blows up like a disintegrator but also have it generate power? Didn't work that way before, but good luck trying it out, perhaps it's possible now.

Sure thing. I guess wanting the game to be actually playable over new features means I don't understand what (perpetual) Alpha is.

someone get this guy his Schema Defense Force badge

Schema certainly has his own way of doing things. Seeing development for a couple years now, it's clear that he likes to add features first and fix stuff second (he's also stated this himself, something to do with it being easier to work it all out once everything is in). However, since this is...