Search results

What sort of power source are you going for? I personally favor fusion on most ships, fission for very small ones that may not have room for a fusion reactor. What powers your ship will have a large impact on the idea situation and shape of the reactor, from an RP perspective. Same goes for...

Heey, you made a half-decent idea with more or less intelligible grammar! You're well on your way to being an actual, functioning member of the community!

Schema has long been against instanced planets, for the reason that he want's surface-to-space interaction to be a thing. But I have to say at the moment, while there is nothing stopping you from doing orbital bombardments and building planetary defense cannons, there is no reason to do that...

Just give me a "fill" function similar to the one in From The Depths, and the ability to auto-fill build helper shapes, and it will easily take off a third of my build time. That much should be doable I expect.

And of course, if you harvested that much gases from a star somehow, it would probably end up lacking the mass to implode, and would more likely gradually fading into a brown dwarf.

I suggest.......... fuel! *DUN-DUN-DUUUUN!* No, but really, stations that harvest fuel from near stars gets my vote.

That's just a background. It doesn't do anything. As for the idea, there are aspects I like, and ones I don't. For instance, the whole harvesting protostars thing just makes my science gland itch. Essentially, what that would be is a huge thermonuclear warhead. Making one of those doesn't...

I doubt that.

WHY IS THIS IN THE SUGGESTIONS FORUM!? I hate to ask this, but you've left me with a choice and I decided to ask it. How old are you? Weather or not you choose to answer, just consider to yourself: am I ready for this forum?

Weather they look like interstellar, classic scifi wormholes (I.E star trek) or something else entirely, their looks certainly need a good overhaul.

Anyone like the idea of punctuation? I do.

I'm not much of a turret builder. Which is exactly why I need this, so I don't have to search through lots and lots of other things to find them.

It WILL effect performance. Now can a moderator delete this thread or merge it with the other one.

They clearly can't do that though, so it doesn't really matter.

They were in a VERY early version of the game, well before the time of all but a very few people on the forums. You would hardly recognize it.

Things various people in the federation should be court martialed and sent to the gulag for: -Exploding consoles -not having and dedicated warships despite everyone wanting to kill them -the holodeck -the appalling training standards among "security" personell -not having a contingent of...

Well, they seem to be able to keep up well enough. And anyway, in the scene I'm thinking of, they had ambassadors and galaxies getting killed in one hit while on the defiant its "shields down to seventy percent" Ect. I mean, I know the ambassador is a bit old and neither of them is a dedicated...

Klingon battlecruisers and romulan warbirds are also dedicated warships. But apparently the defiant is tankyer than them. Also, the defiant has nothing at all like ablative armor as shown in voyager. And anyway, "ablative armor" == armor.

But they specifically said that they have no way of getting new photon torpedoes. Making a torpedo is much simpler than making a new shuttle. Not to mention that they had a whole episode of scrounging hard to get parts when they made the delta flyer, then they lose like six of them and replace...

Don't forget self-replicating shuttles and a new kind of particle to shoot from the main deflector dish for every episode. I really wonder if star trek writers watch star trek sometimes. Also, defiant OP, instakills Galor-class ships with magic pulse-phasers of doom.