Search results

I mean, the solution to this problem is pretty easy- just put enough capacity on the turret so that it can fire the missile properly. (also, putting two weapon types on one turret is a bad idea, since turrets are very bad at leading targets with multiple weapon types with various velocities...

Correction- it needs enough power capacity to fire and not get locked into a no power state.

That sounds like a problem with your turret designs. You do realize that a turret needs enough power capacity to fire its weapons, right?

I'm pretty sure he's saying that Odium Build is like a shifty, back-alley "business." Not sure where you got that idea from.

How about a divider with apostrophes too? 123'456'759.0

I don't understand why you would want to overcomplicate things like that. All my turrets are self-powered.

Can't pay the time, don't do the crime

The big faction would still be likely to "win," as it'd have the most FP at the end of the cycle, though.

Why would you not keep the previous streams up?

The OP suggested that a break for rotation be bound to the same key for breaking linear momentum. We responded with, "if you want that, rebind the rotation break to the linear break." Not really sure what you're going on about here.

All I see are multiple posts of you saying "it's not lock on but the wiki says so" followed by "I thought it wasn't lock on and the wiki agrees with me." Very conflicting and overall confusing.

OP, can I make a suggestion for you? Actually test things before you complain about them being wrong. Also... it's a wiki. You can edit it yourself. I'm pretty sure it's been lock-on since it was added.

So, um... why isn't this tagged as implemented, keptick? We have the 'V' key already, and people can rebind it to shift if they want to have both of those controls bound to the same thing for some bizarre reason (why would you want to stop rotating and movement at the same time, every time, is...

Definitely no thanks. Bubble shields would encourage people to try and ram to stick their guns under the bubble and ignore the enemy shields, which sounds like a disgusting laggy nightmare to me. Rerouting shield strengths to different areas is also not something I agree with. Shields are...

Definitely no. Slaves are a much better system. Lights shouldn't cost power. It prevents people from using lights to guide the way while exploring caves on planets, and they're decorative block, so they shouldn't be a detriment to have. As for the general idea of rerouting power- I think I'd...

I came here to say this. I agree.

That's why you include block count of docked entities? It's not like it's a complex thing to do. Have you actually tested AI? When people say the "30% of a ship's block count in drones can kill it," they're referring to AI drones doing it...

What? Being able to compare systems between two ships of the same or similar ship, or compare ratios of blocks between difference sized ships, is the main advantage of a block count based system. If I compare two 200k block ships, and one has 50k of advanced while the other has 25k of standard...

There's not a uniform convention in naming there because it's just a loose, context-required system for people to use without heavy restrictions. The name goes along with a description, obviously.

Seriously, guys- block count is the best classification system. With that, you can compare strengths and ratios of various systems easily. Then you can tack on name modifiers, if you please. Examples: 15k Ion Bomber- a 15k block ship that uses anti-shield alpha missiles. 500k Heavy Anti-Drone...